this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
360 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19224 readers
2998 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themeatbridge 88 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Not for nothing, but speaking in tongues is demonstrably bullshit. It's been studied linguistically and neurologically, and been found to be wholly non-miraculous.

https://frame-poythress.org/linguistic-and-sociological-analyses-of-modern-tongues-speaking-their-contributions-and-limitations/

[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago (9 children)

Has anything been found to be miraculous?

[–] teft 50 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Sadly, only Miracle Whip has passed the scientific tests to legally be called miraculous.

[–] FattestMattest 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Miracle Max was also pretty miraculous

[–] teft 4 points 8 months ago

Just don't rush him, you don't want rotten miracles.

[–] cedarmesa 7 points 8 months ago

Its got the creamy/tangy in spades

[–] OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe 13 points 8 months ago

Octopi. Miraculous little creatures

[–] themeatbridge 8 points 8 months ago

Well, no. Plenty of things have been, and still are, unexplained, but that doesn't mean they violate the laws of nature. It just means our understanding of those laws is incomplete.

Like 3,000 years ago, a total eclipse would have seemed miraculous, but people of the time just had not yet mapped orbits and the planets.

In this case, glossolalia is a phenomenon that has been well-studied and found to be entirely mundane. They are not speaking foreign languages they had never heard before, they are not speaking new languages, they are not making phonemes that they have not heard before. Anyone can learn to speak in tongues, even if they do not believe in the spirituality of it. Neurologically, someone speaking in tongues is fully conscious and totally in control.

There are no cases of spontaneous glossolalia in groups that are not familiar with the experience.

It's weird, for sure. The people doing it seem to sincerely believe they are doing something. And there's no correlation to neurological conditions or mental illness. Functional MRI exams show that it isn't always controlled by the same part of the brain responsible for speech.

It just seems like people can learn to convince themselves that they have the magic power to talk weird and believe that they are channeling some supernatural power. They are not channeling any supernatural power, they are just making weird noises.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wonder Bread was in the running, back in the 60s.

[–] KnightontheSun 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[–] not_woody_shaw 5 points 8 months ago

Ladybug and Cat Noir.

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Quite a lot actually, through rigorous examination by the Catholic church.

[–] eran_morad 2 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Well, there's a jellyfish capable of immortality. It's as close as anyone is likely to get to a miracle in the real world.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Depends on who you ask. The Catholic Church will claim rigorous evidence of it's miracles, especially the ones that lead to sainthood.

Of course, they don't respect the scientific method, so what's the point of trying to have a serious investigation if the methodology is going to be biased and flawed?

[–] dantheclamman 2 points 8 months ago

There are a lot of aspects of the world that are wonderful, can't yet be explained, and maybe don't even need explanation to be worshiped and enjoyed. Religion is just a means to make sense of these parts of our cosmos (I myself am a complete atheist, but have friends whose lives have been definitely enriched by finding religion). The problems arise when manipulative people codify these beliefs into regimented systems of control. That creates an incentive to coerce others to follow the same beliefs. That in turn leads to religions beginning to be shaped by a kind of memetic survival of the fittest. Some religions try to short-cut the hard work of having actually good ideas that improve people's lives, by instead coercing people into beliefs that maximize birth rate and reduce individual thought.

[–] eran_morad 3 points 8 months ago

Nothing is miraculous. Nothing exists outside of nature. Only dimwits believe in that shit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It seems like a delusion of grandeur. A mental illness.

[–] themeatbridge 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that most religions? You have the sacred knowledge of the divine will of the creator and ultimate judge of the Universe, who is also your close personal friend. You telepathically communicate, and He tells you that everything you already think is correct. Whatever happens in your lifetime, you're going to hang out with Him behind the velvet rope in the afterlife while all of your enemies are tortured for eternity.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah, for some it's a crutch that helps them through difficult times so it's not all bad but largely I agree