Do note that securing a mortgage would probably be a bit harder than buying on your own, but with more people you can acquire a larger space and split the costs that way.

Fundamentally, it's unlikely it will be cheaper than buying outright - however you'll have a community of people to rely on if at any point you become temporarily unable to pay your installments, which can make it safer than self-ownership.

But the biggest plus comes when the mortgage is paid off, as then the coop can decide if you'd rather slash prices to include just bills, or keep the same monthly amount but put the extra towards a shared coop fund that can be used to convert more landlord owned properties into cooperative housing.

In my area - non-mortgaged coop properties have about 40% lower monthly payments.

[–] Custoslibera 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How does it work if a member of the coop stops contributing their share?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If the coop was smart, and it's not a temporary situation or something along those lines, you pay their equity out and wish them luck, but yeah the problem with any coop is always the cooperative part.

[–] zazo 2 points 7 months ago

Yep, the idea is that because the people living at the coop decide who they want to live with (both for existing and new members) the org would have an incentive to cooperate and resolve issues, instead of relying on a third party to be an arbiter that doesn't have a direct stake in your living conditions.