this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
708 points (98.2% liked)

Political Memes

5355 readers
2610 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grue 37 points 6 months ago (2 children)

See also: single-family zoning. "Everybody wants" to live in detached houses, yet they need the law to prohibit property owners from building multifamily...

[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

nimbys: nobody wants multifamily homes
home developers: i got a bunch of people who would pay me $ to build cheap multi family ho-
nimbys: I SAID n̶̨̊o̵͍͑b̴͚̾ǫ̸̍ḓ̷͌y̷͇͊ ̸͇͛w̸͖̓a̵͇̋n̸̘͠t̸͍͗s̸͚̒ ̸̠̕m̷̼͊ü̵̟l̴̜͛t̶̯͊i̷̭͠f̶͎͗ä̵̭́m̸̨̕i̵̫͊l̷͛ͅẙ̷̩ ̷͈̎h̷̘͂ơ̴̗m̴̱̊ȅ̵̙s̴̥̕

[–] jacksilver 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I get the meme and your response, but you could easily flip this one on its side: "Everybody wants clean air to breathe, yet they need laws to prohibit pollution"

[–] grue 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's an issue of externalities, which doesn't really apply to my housing argument.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The NIMBYS would argue "the character of the neighborhood" would suffer. They're fucking selfish assholes for it, but it's an argument.

[–] grue 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If anything, single-family has worse externalities than high density does. Single-family homes have to be subsidized because they don't generate enough tax revenue per acre to pay for the amount of infrastructure they require. (Concrete example: if you have a single-family lot with 100' of street frontage, that one family basically needs to pay enough taxes to maintain 100' of road. But if you have a 10-plex on the same lot, each household only has to pay enough taxes to maintain 10' of road.) Single-family is also inherently the least sustainable in terms of both HVAC costs (because every side of the habitable unit is exposed to the environment) and transportation costs (because low density minimizes walkability).

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Yeah I think pretty much everyone either forgets or doesn't know that the suburbs are subsidized by the city for exactly the reasons you mentioned.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

except multifamily housing areas are consistently nicer than the average suburban desert

even the shittiest commie blocks are reasonably okay places to live in and develop some actual sense of community.