this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
374 points (97.5% liked)

politics

19148 readers
3991 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Donald Trump has to cut a fat check, and his appeal of the E. Jean Carroll verdict won't delay that.
  • Within 30 days of the judge's written judgment, Trump has to turn over either cash or a bond.
  • While he appeals the verdict, Carroll can't touch that money — but neither can Trump.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] teejay 22 points 10 months ago (3 children)

He doesn't have it to hand over

Yes he does. He has to either pay the judgement to her, or put it in escrow if he plans to appeal.

That's over three times what the judge in his fraud trial said Mar-a-Lago was worth (Trump claimed it was worth $1 billion).

I don't understand this statement. Are you suggesting that the reason you think he doesn't have to pay is because it's a lot of money?

[–] FlyingSquid 67 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I think you misread what I wrote.

I said "He doesn’t have it to hand over" not "he doesn't have to hand it over."

He doesn't have it to hand over because he's not that rich.

[–] teejay 38 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Shoot, my bad, you're right. I misread that as "he doesn't have to hand it over".

[–] FlyingSquid 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No problem. I think I could have been clearer. Chalk it up to the perils of communicating over text with no vocal inflections.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I give both of you an A+ in communication. You can now kiss or not up to you two really

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

There is a lot of sexual tension between those two.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

I'm writing the erotic fanfic now

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago

gonna just point out the collective PTSD we are all suffering. I also initially read it incorrectly and didnt bother re-reading because... well... "its the orange asshole - of course he's avoiding consequence... again!"

this puss filled ass boil needs to see jail time.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

I misread it as well. Better to just be blunt and say "Trump is broke as fuck"

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Wow, yeah, my brain absolutely read "He doesn't have to hand it over" 😂

[–] FlyingSquid 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I can see how my choice of words could have been confusing.

[–] TropicalDingdong 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He doesn’t have it to hand over because he’s not that rich.

I've reread it 6 times and still having trouble parsing it.

[–] Nfamwap 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Can he hand it over?

No, because he doesn't have it.

He doesn't have it to hand over.

[–] TropicalDingdong 4 points 10 months ago

Yes. He doesn't not have it to not have hand it over.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Mine too. Reading too quickly for that series of words to come out correctly, I guess?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Even after you clarified here I still had to analyse those sentences for the difference

[–] themeatbridge 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not the person you replied to, but I believe the person is saying "he doesn't have it, so therefore he cannot hand over something he doesn't have."

[–] teejay 3 points 10 months ago

Yep, that was my mistake.

[–] sharkaccident 6 points 10 months ago

Yes he does. He has to either pay the judgement to her, or put it in escrow if he plans to appeal

No he doesn't. I hate trump as much as anyone else, but all he has to do is get someone else to post bond (he will still have to provide a percentage to cover). There is a long list of people/companies/countries that would take that gamble assuming he gets reelected.