this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2024
690 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19142 readers
3505 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The reporting errors were presumably a consequence of the results tapes not being programmed to a format that was compatible with state reporting requirements. Attempts to correct this issue appear to have created errors. The reporting errors did not consistently favor one party or candidate but were likely due to a lack of proper planning, a difficult election environment, and human error.

...

The discrepancies did not affect the outcome of any of the elections, but they did add to a growing list of defeats for Trump’s election lies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 125 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Surprise, surprise. Yet another accusation turns out to be an admission. Colour me shocked.

[–] FuglyDuck 56 points 9 months ago (2 children)

What's surprising is, they actually admitted they found it, rather than dragging out a report until nobody cares anymore

[–] Coach 54 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's three years later. How much longer could you drag this news out?

[–] FuglyDuck 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] utopianfiat 32 points 9 months ago (2 children)

They're still claiming they didn't steal 2000 from Gore

[–] saltesc 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I've seen people rant about Obama like Biden doesn't even exist yet and confusing 22A as Obama "losing" and his re-election a big threat.

I'm not even from the US and I know this isn't a thing. Outside of pure monarchy rules, there's not many countries out there without term limits.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Canada doesn't have a term limit...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

That's monarchy rules. The head of state technically is King Charles.

[–] saltesc 0 points 9 months ago

I feel like I already covered that and then some in the initial comment. I'm sorry you had to do it again for our mate here, but thank you for your vigilance.

[–] FuglyDuck 3 points 9 months ago

there's that. But also, like... how many investigations got started by the SEC and then suddenly never reported on? and not like "well we didn't actually find anything" reports that just got closed out, but still-open investigations that just never get closed?

Or the EPA, or the FCC, FTC. IRS. Congressional ethics committee types, too. toss in the rest of the alphabet soup regulatory bodies here, too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

I could be misremembering, but I feel like I remember them admitting it in Arizona, too.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Every conservative accusation is actually a confession.

Just a reminder, they are actively trying to steal this phrase right now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Just a reminder, they are actively trying to steal this phrase right now.

Oh? I'm out of the loop on this one. Any links to this sort of idiodicy? I'm genuinely curious how they could possibly coopt this.