this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
297 points (96.8% liked)

196

16898 readers
2213 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 89 points 1 year ago (2 children)

These type of charts annoy me because they have redundant information. They're symmetric along the diagonal.

[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 year ago

Particularly when they don't have to be. These relationships are rarely symmetric.

[–] GraniteM 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there a better way to present the data with less redundancy?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Typically you'd just present it as the upper diagonal of the matrix.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then you can't just scan a row and get the whole info about a country. Images are rectangular anyways

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can if you pick a column. What i would do is put the name of each group in the gray box which is currently just where each group intersects with themselves. Then delete everything above that so it's just a triangle.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Why tho? It makes parsing at least somewhat harder and you don't save any space