this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
859 points (90.6% liked)

Political Memes

5510 readers
3124 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Eldritch 42 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Israel is not "Jewish people". Israel "could" end without a single Jew dying. Also, Jews lived there when it was Palestine. I dunno did they die when it became Israel? How are you arriving at the end of a concept being mass murder?

I think if Israel stopped trying to run itself as an ethnostate they'd be fine. I think there's an argument that the "concept" of what currently constitutes Israel may be too tainted to realistically save. Many unwilling to admit fault, apologize, and return what was stolen. And many unwilling to forgive them for doing it. It would take real concession and change. Something those in charge don't want. So the people both Israeli and Palestinian will continue to suffer for the gains of wealthy genocidal bigots.

[–] themeatbridge 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Many Palestinians were killed or died in the transition when Israel was established.

I agree with you that Israel needs to change, and that they aren't going to change unless they are forced to change. But the Jewish people living in Israel will not leave peacefully. To "end" Israel is to kill a lot of Jewish people living there.

And the antisemites are counting on everyone making a distinction between the two.

[–] DeadHorseX 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)

There's no scenario, in any possible world, in which the 'abolition' of Israel doesn't result in the deaths of millions of Jews.

[–] Eldritch 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There is a difference between possible and likely. And you my friend are misrepresenting the two. It is 100% possible. But it also is unlikely because of all the genocidal ethno statists.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Well, at least absent a secular awakening in the middle east. And that is the real issue here in my view, and I'm not sure why so many people seem to be giving a pass to the extremist elephant in the room here.

[–] orrk 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

there are many worlds where the abolition of Israel wouldn't result in the deaths of Jewish people, unless you swallow the fascist dichotomy of "Israel is the only safe place for Jews" and "Israel is inherently in danger, due to group X"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Israel "could" end without a single Jew dying

The history of this region proves this to not be the case though. Jews have mostly been chased out of the region a few times with many dead left in the wake.

Jews did not live peacefully before the British mandate ended, there's a long list of pogroms and assaults leading to many dead in the hundreds of years leading up to the UN establishment of the state.

It would be great if they could live peacefully but history shows that's a risk they can't take.