this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
754 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19148 readers
4191 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“I’ll tell you a secret, since media is not here. Thank you for not allowing the media in. Look, I’m a Southern Baptist, I don’t wanna get too spooky on you, But, you know, the Lord speaks to your heart.

“The Lord began to wake me up, through this three-week process, in the middle of night to speak to me. The Lord impressed upon my heart a few weeks before this happened that something was going to occur.

“And the Lord very specifically told me in my prayers to prepare, but to wait. At the time, I assumed the Lord was going to choose a new Moses and thank you, Lord, you’re going to allow me to be Aaron to Moses.

“I had this sense that we were going to come to a Red Sea moment in our Republican conference and in the county at large. God had been speaking to me about this, and the Lord told me very clearly to prepare and be ready.

“Ultimately 13 people ran for the post. And the Lord kept telling me to, ‘Wait, wait, wait.’ So I waited, I waited. And then at the end the Lord said, ‘Now step forward.’

“Me? I’m supposed to be Aaron. ‘No,’ the Lord said, ‘Step forward.’” – Mike Johnson, speaking last night to the far-right National Association of Christian Lawmakers.

This man is a true believer. True believers do not compromise anything that goes against what they believe their religion tells them. This man is far more dangerous than Donald Trump, who is simply a grifter and was in it for himself. This guy thinks the gods have ordained him. Anybody who stands against him is going against God, in his own mind.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] peopleproblems 43 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Yes Mr. Johnson, it's called the inner monolog, and we all have it. Yours doesn't make you special because it says so.

Or it might if you don't recognize it as yours and it starts telling you delusional things, such as being a prophet.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Reminds me of the South Park episode The Douche.

Paraphrased but basically, yes we all hear voices in our head but its just our inner monologue you douche.

What if I really believe I hear voices?

Then you're a stupid douche.

[–] agent_flounder 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure that the latter possibility would be a symptom of a mental disorder of some kind.

By the way, apparently not everyone has an inner monologue.

This is a sort of dumb article based on a reddit thread on the topic where people discuss their experiences

https://www.iflscience.com/people-with-no-internal-monologue-explain-what-its-like-in-their-head-57739

This is an article from an actually respectable source

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/intersections/202304/inner-monologues-what-are-they-and-whos-having-them

[–] khannie 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

When I was younger I had no inner monologue. I thought in concepts is about the best way I can describe it. It was way, way more efficient as a thought process.

I miss that sometimes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Psychedelics may be something you'd enjoy.

[–] Baphomet_The_Blasphemer 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Not to diminish your point as I totally agree with what you're saying, but interestingly enough, not everybody does have that inner monologue. It is estimated that anywhere between 30% - 50% of the population has the ability to have conversations with themselves inside their head, the other 50% - 70% of the population can not. As someone with an inner monologue, I can't even begin to comprehend how that works.

[–] Buddahriffic 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I've never been able to keep up the habit, but I've tried silencing my inner monologue. It's not necessary, I already know what the full thought is going to be before I even start "vocalizing it" inside my head. Thought would be faster without taking the time to encode it in a spoken language. But I suspect it's also sloppier. That conversion to spoken language gives your brain more time to consider the thought.

Think of the times you've said something or started saying something and then realized right after or part way through that it is a candidate for the dumbest thing you've ever said. I don't know about everyone else, but I catch myself thinking thoughts like that, too. I wonder if those who don't have an inner monologue are more likely to just move on without noticing.

I wonder if that's a fundamental difference that plays a role in how differently some people see and interact with the world.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

The conversion also helps you explain it to others.

[–] peopleproblems 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You know, I wonder what my deaf uncle's equivalent to an inner monologue is. I would imagine it's different having never heard speech before (he was born deaf).

[–] Baphomet_The_Blasphemer 3 points 11 months ago

I actually saw this question asked on reddit way back, and the top answer was they think in a combination of sign language (words) and images since speaking is foreign to them... I'll give this statement an 87% chance of being an accurate recall.