this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
1678 points (97.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26963 readers
4636 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ggBarabajagal 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

We have a "voluntary" tax system in the U.S. -- that's always been the situation. "Voluntary" doesn't mean that that you can choose to not volunteer to pay your taxes. It mostly just means that the way we run things, by default, it is each citizen's responsibility to calculate and pay their taxes each April.

American taxpayers filled out 1040 forms in the days before computers, a lot like they do now. The IRS selected certain fillings for audits, just like they do now -- sometimes because of an apparent discrepancy, and sometimes just at random.

It would be a lot more work, take a lot more resources, and be prone to a lot more error and lawsuits, if the IRS tried to calculate everyone's taxes for them. Even now that we are in the days of computers, it is much more efficient for the IRS to only audit a fraction of the filings submitted each year.

I'm also pretty sure our "voluntary" tax filling system has something to do with the Fourth Amendment and other privacy concerns. A lot of Americans very strongly believe that it is not the government's place to be all up in their private business.

-- EDIT to add:

There is a difference between whether it would be possible for the IRS to calculate individual citizens' taxes and whether we should abandon our voluntary tax system for one in which the IRS simply calculates the taxes owed by every citizen and send us each a bill. My original response was intended to address the latter, but now I'll say something about the former:

For someone whose single source of income is a job working for someone else, of course it is possible for the IRS to calculate your taxes. You've already volunteered all the information the IRS needs to do so. Your employer has already told the IRS exactly how much income you've earned and exactly how much of it you've had withheld for taxes. Remember when you signed that withholding paperwork with the HR department on your first day? That was the moment when you personally volunteered your income information and payments to the IRS. You've literally already been reporting your income and paying taxes on it ever since.

The way taxes work in practice for a single-income employee does not reveal the potential complexity of tax accounting for individuals who are self-employed, who have multiple sources of income, and anyone who doesn't want to make regular fillings and withholding payments throughout the year. The tax situation for single-income American employees is not the situation for all Americans. Not everyone has an employer who calculates their taxes and pays installments for them throughout the year.

It is common for Americans to have a single job with an employer who calculates and pays their taxes for them. This makes it very easy for the IRS to know exactly how much the taxpayer owes (or is owed) at the end of the year. If it ends up feeling to like this is the same thing as the IRS calculating your taxes for you, however, I'm guessing it's because you forgot that it's actually your employer who's been doing that accounting job for you all along, with each paycheck.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Yet many other countries do in fact calculate taxes for their citizens. You just need to check it and sign.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

America has a serious skill issue in all things.

[–] sock 1 points 1 year ago

more like a population issue and too much diversity to agree on anything to make a law

and i mean diverse opinions and backgrounds not skin color or whatever.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah, they send me mine calculated, and ask if I want to change anything. I look over it and and, as if I understand it all, say " That'll do pig"

[–] ggBarabajagal 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you need to check it, then maybe they are not calculating your taxes for you, so much they are taking their best guess and asking you to sign off on it. If their best guess is as good (or better) than yours, there is no difference in practice. But there is still a difference in principle: whether a citizen is permitted to declare their own income or whether the government is obliged to determine it for them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not exactly a guess, more like "this is what we know about your income. Would you like to add anything?"

[–] ggBarabajagal 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But how do they know what they know about your income? Didn't you (or your employer on your behalf) already volunteer this information to the government in the first place? Or is your government monitoring your private financial transactions without your express consent?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yes my employer is required to provide this information to the government.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not exactly, since the IRS provides tons of credits and deductions for things that aren't inherently trackable, like credits for upgrading your home to be more "green," asset depreciation, or any other of the thousand random things they incentivize

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We have those kinds of deductions in Sweden too. The company that upgrades your home files for the money of your deduction with the IRS and then reduces your bill by the corresponding amount.

If you do the renovations yourself you have to file for the deduction yourself, so there are certainly many situations where you can't just have every single part of the tax forms automatically calculated. But typically it's just a matter of logging in to the IRS website and providing the facts as you know them ("I bought stock for X and sold it for Y") then the system calculates the rest for you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

But it's honestly stupid to do it that way at the individual taxpayer level. Do you think the EU doesn't subsidize anything? They subsidize hella things.

They just do it the real way, through spending. In the US, Republicans in Congress can never agree to spend money, just tax cuts. Tax cuts are spending.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The IRS is confident it can do direct file for most american returns, which is why its running a pilot program this year to do just that.

[–] Blue_Morpho 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if the IRS tried to calculate everyone’s taxes for them

The IRS does calculate everyone's taxes without an audit. If you mistype a bank statement you will get a bill or a check from the IRS (depending on whether the error was paying too much or too little).

An audit is completely different than the typical, "you typed $1000 in bank interest but you only really received $100 so here's a check for the difference in taxes. This has happened to me many times over the years. It's why I no longer get stressed over taxes because I know the IRS will just send me a bill or a check in 6 months to fix any mistakes.

[–] ggBarabajagal 2 points 1 year ago

The IRS calculates an employee's taxes based on the income and withholding information provided to the IRS by the employer. The employee "volunteers" his tax information (and IRS witholding payment, if any) with each paycheck. The accounting for all this is listed right there on the paystub.

[–] bouh 4 points 1 year ago

We had the same in France until not so long ago. It is a democratic principle that you voluntarily and freely pay your taxes, rather than the state take your money without you hvving a say in it.

It is both a principle of transparency and consent for taxes.