this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
52 points (98.1% liked)

Canada

7357 readers
330 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


๐Ÿ’ต Finance, Shopping, Sales


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] NotMyOldRedditName 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Harper crippled us long term by reducing the GST.

It'll be political suicide to increase it for anyone, and now we all suffer.

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not where I'd go. In Canada right now, investment income is taxed at a much lower rate than income from actual work, and that seems messed up. I don't know how much would be brought in by changing that, but it's not nothing. And, of course, you could always do things with the upper tax brackets.

[โ€“] NotMyOldRedditName 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it makes sense for investments to be less though as you're risking something vs just income. One is safe the other isn't.

But messing with upper brackets does increase tax revenue from investments of the wealthy as well so it is probably the easiest of all spots.

[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it makes sense for investments to be less though as youโ€™re risking something vs just income. One is safe the other isnโ€™t.

You're of course allowed to have that opinion, but I'd like to point out working for a living isn't risk-free either. 10 million in a conservative ETF is probably less likely to fail than a job you could get laid off from.

Yes, some kind of income tax is probably best. Honestly if it was up to me I'd get rid of corporate taxes in favour of them too, although I think there's treaty obligations not to do that right now.

[โ€“] NotMyOldRedditName 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What I'd also like to see, but would be difficult to implement is taxing the wealthy when they use assets for leverage / borrowing to avoid taxes.

They can defer taxes for decades this way, in some cases until they die.

Leave it for us small timers, but put a limit somewhere where it becomes taxed somehow.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I am fine with reducing CONSUMPTION tax which mostly impact the poor and the middle class. We should be raising the taxes on investment income.