this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
487 points (96.0% liked)
Technology
59588 readers
6310 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Seems like the RTO was rushed and mishandled for some reason. I can only guess they wanted to punish the unionizers or just do a major layoff without calling it a layoff.
Article explains it:
They hired a rightwingers as CEO, and even if he changed his mind on social policy, he's still obviously a Republican on fiscal.
This is a way to get rid of highly paid people since the labor pool for tech ballooned after twitter fired everyone.
He's hoping for a short dip, then replacing everyone for cheaper salaries.
Jesus. The CEO of Grindr is a supporter of homophobes. We truly are in the worst timeline.
He googled "how to fuck the gays" and grindr was the top result.
Yep. Grinder is a trash company now. I think it was even owned by a company in China for a while, which is just weird.
Seems like it would just be a useful database for blackmailing a bunch of closeted guys.
That’s one of the older tricks, no pun intended. It used to be that you’d have a hard time getting a security clearance if you were gay, with the excuse being that you were vulnerable to blackmail. It’s less of a big deal now, but I can think of a wide class of politicians who would still be vulnerable to blackmail, and grindr is a very popular app during political conventions.
Yeah that seems reasonable. RTO is quite a powerful/interesting tool for these employers
The second part, I think people don't pick up on that often enough. These return to office pushes are soft layoffs. They get to do a layoff without paying severance or even unemployment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructive_dismissal
You’d think hiring someone fully remote then changing the terms of the job would qualify but I m only a bird lawyer.
While this is true, they also don't get to have as much control and who leaves.
Normally when you do layoffs you strategically keep the people on who were best for the company.
Corporate culture these days seems to value people who will eat shit and smile, not expect raises and not quit when they should above most other metrics.... so they do keep the people "best" for the company.
Maybe, but this way you have no control on who leave, which probably are the people you would like to keep since they are the most valuable people you have and being good they could find a job that accomodate their WFH request.