this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
414 points (99.5% liked)

196

16574 readers
1863 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] itsJoelle 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Nah dawg, I'm a Dev. The websites for the menus are usually fucking aweful, and are, ironically enough, not optimized for mobile.

Usually you can request a physical menu, as to not look at the webdev gore.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If they design the online menu well, I'm all for it. In theory, an online only menu should improve the quality of the menu, by making it much easier to keep it up to date (eg, there should never be an "ask your server what the soup of the day is" in an online menu -- update that you lazy schmucks) and it's also easier for them to have pictures.

The fact that not every food item has pictures drives me crazy. Show me what the dang food looks like. Unless it's something you never sell, it's so dang easy to get a picture when someone orders it. I don't want a fake picture anyway; I want the pictures to be representative of how it will really look. With physical menus, it's understandable because printing is so expensive and pictures would make the menu extra long. Online menus don't have that issue or excuse.

But yeah, if their online menu is gonna be a mediocre PDF copy of their former print menus clearly designed for 8x11 or whatever, it's a downright worse experience using a digital menu. That's the case for a shocking number of restaurants I've been at. You'd think mobile devices are some new fangled fad or something, cause they sure don't think mobile is something someone will view their menu on.

[–] ManjuuLemmy 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think my real complaint is that I'm using my data to pay them more money for services they should already be offering customers. It feels like we might as well end with a step-by-step self-cooking restaurant and we pay them to cook the food ourselves.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

If it meant I didn't have to clean, and they prep all the annoying stuff, I feel like I'd totally try a restaurant where you cook your own meal

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Sshhhh!

Don't give them ideas!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

That and it's usually hosted off some slow ass, janky website where I hit refresh three times to get all the assets to load without timing out.

"Uhh, yes, I'll have the 404 not found, dressing on the side, with a 504 gateway timeout, medium rare. Oh, and could we get a round of 500 internal server error for the table, please?"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

In my experience over half the time it's a PDF, and the rest of the time it's usually a *decent* website with at least responsive design.

At any rate it's usually far better than the GrubHub et al menus which are often out of date and mis-organized.