this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
810 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19130 readers
2258 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The share of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents who believe that President Joe Biden’s 2020 election win was not legitimate has ticked back up, according to a new CNN poll fielded throughout July. All told, 69% of Republicans and Republican-leaners say Biden’s win was not legitimate, up from 63% earlier this year and through last fall, even as there is no evidence of election fraud that would have altered the outcome of the contest.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kescusay 213 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The really shocking thing here is that 31% of Republicans are still aware of reality enough to understand that Biden won legitimately.

[–] givesomefucks 141 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Like 70% also believe angels are real...

Apparently decades of No Child Left Behind and removing critical thinking from public education did what republicans wanted it to do

[–] NounsAndWords 62 points 1 year ago

You're assuming they actually believe what they are saying and are arguing in good faith. That hasn't been in the Republican playbook since at least Nixon.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not to defend No Child Left Behind but it was only a 2002 law, the majority of these people are too old to have been in school since its passage.

[–] dx1 15 points 1 year ago

Normalize questioning random ideas about politics people toss out

[–] III 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes but that change affected anyone in school at the time as well. No Child Left Behind touched the schooling of people up to the age of 38. That's roughly half of Americans. You would need to remove people not of voting age, but the impact is still huge.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

It was repealed & replaced in 2015 anyway so it was only in effect for 13 years and over half of states had waivers for it by then anyway. Once again not defending the state of public education or laws passed affecting it, just making sure we all know the facts.

[–] givesomefucks 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

But if it wasn't for that, republicans wouldn't be getting elected still...

Obviously I didn't mean the only people who believe this shit is the kids from No Child, mostly because red states were already doing it on a state level.

But there's enough of them that it's keeping republicans in office where they wouldn't be without it.

Very very few problems have a single cause, again, I thought that was so obvious it wouldn't need to be explained. But here we are...

[–] danc4498 11 points 1 year ago

Don't worry, they're fixing this by burning books. We'll be back to the 50's in no time!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You act like it's limited to the younger generations of Republicans.

[–] Fredselfish 34 points 1 year ago

Doesn't help that they are allowing Trump to run around the country to continue to say he was cheated and that the election was stolen. They are literally waiting until next year to even put him on trial.

Plenty of time for him to cause as much harm as possible.

[–] LEDZeppelin 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those 30% will still vote R, even after knowing that they have been lied to by the republicans.

When republicans voters call others “cucks”, you know it’s all a projection.

[–] Ensign_Crab 6 points 1 year ago

They've largely stopped using "cuck" as an insult since the high mark of their movement involved a guy wearin' horns.

[–] AbidanYre 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or they're just embarrassed to admit what they really think.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Are they capable of shame? Seems like they revel in the absolute worst behavior possible.