this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
1098 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19247 readers
3340 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Warning: NSFW language

“Jewish men have small cocks because they can’t use them after they get married,” Giuliani said, according to the transcript. “Whereas the Italian use them all their lives so they get bigger.”

Giuliani railed against how Jewish people “want to go through that freaking Passover all the time” and how they should “get over the Passover” because it was 3,000 years ago. “OK, the Red Sea parted,” the transcript reads. “Big deal. Not the first time that happened.”

Giuliani doesn’t elaborate on other instances when the Red Sea was parted.

The transcripts also feature Giuliani discussing which celebrities are Republican. Giuliani is trying to think of someone in particular and Dunphy volunteers that Matt Damon is “very liberal.”

“Matt Damon is a fag,” Giuliani replies. “Matt Damon is also 5’2″, eyes are blue. Coochi-coochie-coochie-coo.”

Various websites list Damon as around 5’10”. It’s unclear why Giuliani invoked the 1920s song “Has Anybody Seen My Girl? (Five Foot Two, Eyes of Blue)” or what it has to do with the actor.

Then there are the lewd comments directed toward Dunphy. “Come here, big tits,” Giuliani says on one occasion, according to the transcript. “Come here, big tits. Your tits belong to me. Give them to me [indiscernable]. I want to claim my tits. I want to claim my tits. I want to claim my tits. These are my tits.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Lemmylefty 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This sounds like irritable dementia.

[–] kescusay 39 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Except he's been this way for years. Giuliani is just a scummy, despicable man.

[–] zeppo 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was revolted by the "America's Mayor" shit in 2001, as if we were supposed to be amazed about him personally, that a disaster happened in his city and he did an adequate job responding to it. He was a shitbag before that, with things like 'stop and frisk' and 'broken window policing' (which were essentially authoritarian ways to harass poor people) and obviously continues to be one to this day.

[–] FlyingSquid 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I guarantee you someone more competent would have done a much better job on 9/11.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate 15 points 1 year ago

What he did most effectively on 9/11 was polish his personal brand with it. He took every opportunity to be on camera, and mentioned it in every interview for years afterwards. It's less clear that he was much of an asset to the efforts.

[–] zeppo 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it’s extremely unclear to me what he did that was so special. Walked around the WTC site? Amazing

[–] TechyDad 3 points 1 year ago

Exactly, though if he retired after 9/11 nobody would have questioned whether his "America's Mayor" label was earned or not. He'd have gone down in the history books as a great man (totally unearned but that's what the history books would have said).

He just had to keep opening his mouth, though.

[–] Lemmylefty 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s the “not the first time it’s happened/coochie coochie” bit that has me thinking that he’s expressing a freer association than most.

It’s still vulgar, but there’s an element of the words not really linking up to the topic while still maintaining the flow of a sentence or conversation.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

So that's what the "G" in GPT stands for!

[–] utopianfiat 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And Comey was in love with the guy

[–] AFKBRBChocolate 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sarcasm, right? Comey had nothing good to say about him in his book.

[–] utopianfiat 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did we read the same book? In the first chapter he describes fawning over Giuliani early in his career

[–] AFKBRBChocolate 3 points 1 year ago

My recollection is that he admired the man by reputation before he actually got to interact with him, but once he saw what Giuliani was like, he thought he was horrible.

[–] dhork 8 points 1 year ago

Or a bit too much vodka