this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
147 points (97.4% liked)

196

16238 readers
2037 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Nobel created his prize because everyone knew him for creating bombs and he wanted to be remembered for doing something good. Awarding someone a Nobel prize for creating a giant bomb would be pretty ironic.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To be fair though. The bomb probably saved more lives than it killed. Soo far at least

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's a lie that the US government has desperately been trying to push for decades. The creation and detonation of nukes was an entirely avoidale atrocity.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

The truth is we can't know for sure. There's no way to look into an alternative timeline to see what the Cold War would have been like without nukes as deterrents.

@Zirconium said "probably" and you flat out called it a lie, so you're more wrong than they are.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Shaun made an excellent video on the topic, although you're going to have to invest a lot of time into watching it. It's got a good selection of sources, too, for those of you who love to hold on to the common narrative that dropping the bomb was necessary.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=RCRTgtpC-Go

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] slaacaa 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wow, it must be definitely like you said, because you say it so confidently!

/s

load more comments (7 replies)