this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
894 points (98.4% liked)

politics

21050 readers
5045 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 183 points 2 days ago (29 children)

Fuck all democrats who voted to censure him.

[–] [email protected] 119 points 2 days ago (21 children)

They voted to censure Rep Tlaib for asking that the US stop helping to bomb her family members.

Democrats are fascists with a BLM sticker and a rainbow flag, and they're busy scraping off the rainbow flag.

[–] givesomefucks 42 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Democrats are fascists with a BLM sticker and a rainbow flag, and they’re busy scraping off the rainbow flag.

A lot of them are like that, but not enough aren't.

Which is why we need to get dirty money out of Dem primaries, regardless of what Nancy Pelosi says.

To paraphrase Kendrick:

Few solid Dems left, but it's not enough

[–] Goodmorningsunshine 6 points 1 day ago

Pelosi is dirty money. Get that hag out and it'll clean up the Dems more than anything

[–] Intergalactic 13 points 2 days ago (4 children)
  1. Nice Kendrick reference

  2. We need to do away with the party, but unfortunately building a new broad front would take years.

[–] DaveyRocket 0 points 8 hours ago

Strongly disagree. Look at how effective the Tea Party was at changing the entire GOP. We just need people to be as outraged by what’s currently happening as the Tea Party was about having a black president.

[–] Ensign_Crab -1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

We could just walk in and take over the green party.

[–] Intergalactic 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, the PSL is a far better party.

[–] Ensign_Crab 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

With worse infrastructure. The entire point of stealing a party is to use what they've built.

[–] Intergalactic 1 points 1 hour ago

Worse infrastructure is laughable, their entire party infrastructure makes it so that bad faith actors don’t undermine their goals, and honestly, I might join them.

In the topic of stealing a party, The Green Party isn’t worth stealing.

[–] makyo 6 points 2 days ago

2 - absolutely but with the time we have we have to pressure them to change and build a groundswell in the faint hope that there's enough of us and enough of a vote left in 2026 to make some changes at the primary level

[–] givesomefucks 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The party is a dictatorship where the chair has final say on almost everything and zero accountability to anyone.

Luckily we got a decent chair now.

We 100% need to change how that's set up, but the party just took his biggest step left in 30 years.

Ken Martin doesn't push progressive policy per say, but he gives voters want they want, and they want progressive policy from charismatic candidates. Just not standing in the way of voters would have beat trump last election.

We don't need a whole lot more from the party.

[–] Intergalactic 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, their chair isn’t good at all.

He has stated that the Democrats would take money from “good billionaires”

There is no such thing.

[–] givesomefucks -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

LMAO.

The fact that one comment during an interview, during the campaign where he had to get elected by the voting members of the DNC is the only thing out of decades of politics that people can latch onto to call this guy a neoliberal just makes me all the more confident.

Saying "no, there are no good billionaires" in response to that question would have prevented him from ever becoming chair...

Like, bro gave a bullshit wiffle waffle answer to a gotcha question, and that's seriously the worst anyone can say about him?

Like, just the fact that's all the dirt that can be dug up over his long history with the party is enough for me to say he's the furthest left chair in decades.

My favorites example tho is when he camped out overnight with pro-Gaza protestors who were protesting the DNC so he could ensure their right to protest was protected and police wouldn't hassle them.

[–] Ensign_Crab 0 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The fact that one comment during an interview, during the campaign where he had to get elected by the voting members of the DNC is the only thing out of decades of politics that people can latch onto to call this guy a neoliberal just makes me all the more confident.

Then he dug a hole he needs to get himself out of.

[–] givesomefucks 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Man, actually kind of sad to add you to the block list...

But there's not time for this bullshit and getting hung up wasting time explaining things to people that can't understand.

I hope you come around, but I'll never know

[–] Ensign_Crab 1 points 11 hours ago

But there’s not time for this bullshit and getting hung up wasting time explaining things to people that can’t understand.

You may understand simping for billionaires.

[–] Intergalactic 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] givesomefucks -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Literal days after the October attacks...

He said that calling for the destruction of Israel was overboard...

That's too much?

Let's switch gears here

If Ken Martin is not the furtherest left DNC chair we've had in 30 years, by all means name drop who you think it was.

[–] Intergalactic 1 points 20 hours ago

The Democratic Party is and always will be a centrist party funded by oligarchs.

They’re already propping up another Kamala Harris run.

Revolution against this fucked up system is truly our only option.

[–] Ensign_Crab 0 points 17 hours ago

Luckily we got a decent chair now.

That remains to be seen.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They always take those left steps when they are not in a position of power to do anything with it. Then quickly shift back to the right when they are.

[–] givesomefucks -1 points 2 days ago

That's not how the chair works, Ken Martin has it four years unless he steps down, it's figuratively and literally his party.

In four years if what he does gets a Dem elected, that Dem is almost guaranteed to pick Ken if he wants to keep it, and the vote after is largely performative. (Side note, Obama's fuckup was refusing to pick someone).

If Ken doesn't want it, that president will still pick someone.

So we have someone who won't fight a progressive candidate, and then a progressive candidate that will pick the next chair if they win.

Seriously, there's a shit ton of reasons to be optimistic.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)