this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
521 points (98.0% liked)

Privacy

1023 readers
1609 users here now

Protect your privacy in the digital world

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be nice, civil and no bigotry/prejudice.
  2. No tankies/alt-right fascists. The former can be tolerated but the latter are banned.
  3. Stay on topic.
  4. Don't promote proprietary software.
  5. No crypto, blockchain, etc.
  6. No Xitter links. (only allowed when can't fact check any other way, use xcancel)
  7. If in doubt, read rule 1

Related communities:

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/26136291

Mozilla has just deleted the following:

“Does Firefox sell your personal data?”

“Nope. Never have, never will. And we protect you from many of the advertisers who do. Firefox products are designed to protect your privacy. That’s a promise. "

Source: Lundke journal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 62 points 21 hours ago (6 children)

So if you don’t want to use a chromium based browser but also care about privacy, you’re now fucked?

[–] [email protected] 63 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Firefox is open-source. Certainly, you're out of options in terms of "name-brand" browsers, but there's a number of Firefox forks. On desktop, LibreWolf is the closest thing to mainline and on Android, IronFox is the equivalent.

If you want something more than just "Firefox minus the branding and tracking", some of the deeper forks are Zen Browser and Floorp.

[–] cultsuperstar 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Do any of these also have an Android equivalent? I liked being able to browse on my phone and continue on my desktop and vice versa.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

There's no technical reason why you need to be using the same-named fork on desktop and Android; they will all communicate via Firefox Sync. e.g. I'm running LibreWolf (desktop) and IronFox (Android) with my data synced, but you could just as easily sync Zen Browser (desktop) and Fennec F-Droid (Android), etc.

That said, if you want to get both browsers from the same team/with the same branding, I think Waterfox is probably your best bet. It doesn't have quite as strong a privacy focus as LibreWolf/IronFox, which both ship with very strict privacy-focussed defaults, which many users will likely roll back. For example, the default setting in LibreWolf is to delete all history and cookies on exit. Even so, Waterfox is more privacy-focussed than upstream Firefox and has released a statement on the Mozilla license changes if you want to get a feel for their perspective.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

What happened to Fennec and PaleMoon? Are they no bueno these days?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I can't speak to PaleMoon, but I use Fennec on my phone. My understanding is that they try to track as closely as they can to Firefox main, but with enough changes to be a separate thing.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I've heard nothing negative about PaleMoon either, as far as privacy. I do think it's a bit tougher to recommend to the average user due to its single-process architecture.

The memory footprint is great, but everybody is kind of used to the performance and stability gains from multi-process browsers. I would feel weird recommending somebody coming off Firefox jump to PaleMoon.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I feel weird recommending any Firefox fork other than Iceweasel/Fennec (name change only, pretty much) or Tor/Mullvad Browser. Everything else runs a risk of poor maintenance, which could lead to security vulnerabilities.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

If you don't want to use Gecko nor Chromium, I am aware of the following alternatives:

WebKit

Though associated with Apple and Safari, WebKit (@[email protected]) has its origins in KDE and its Konqueror browser. KDE developed its own web engine called KHTML, which was forked into WebKit. It's therefore fully open source, despite the Apple connection.

On Linux you can use WebKit in GNOME Web (formerly Epiphany) or Konqueror. If you're on Mac, Safari is probably your best bet. Windows users appear to be out of luck.

Servo

Servo (@[email protected]) is a brand new Rust-based engine which was originally developed by Mozilla, but which was abandoned by them like good things often are. Thankfully the Linux foundation took over developments. It's still in development, but from their download page you can take it for a spin within seconds on all three major operating systems. It's looking pretty good.

They maintain a list of things made with Servo. The most promising project so far appears to be a browser named Verso.

Ladybird

Ladybird is another development to follow. Unlike WebKit and Servo, Ladybird is being developed as a web browser in its own right, but this browser will come with a completely original rendering engine. It aims to have an alpha released next year, and is largely written in C++.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 19 hours ago

Funnily enough WebKit was Chromium's original engine.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 19 hours ago

They maintain a list of things made with Servo

As someone who has been closely following the development of Servo, today I still learned that Verso and Servoshell are not the only things using Servo.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I just wish it worked on Apple Silicon.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Your wish has been granted. 😁

It’s on the GitHub release page.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

I ran it recently on the latest iMac with no issues.

[–] whaleross 8 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

I've seen a lot of advocating for Waterfox that I believe is a fork of FF without corporate shenanigans.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Don't they have a bunch of security issues gone untouched for over a decade now?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I can't find any source on this (although I didn't look to hard, on mobile)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This list is valid but applies to Firefox, not just Waterfox.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

Does Waterfox (or any of the other forks people are proposing) have apps for iPad OS and Android, and account syncing to enable bookmarks, extensions, and tabs to transfer between devices?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

i just put ironfox on my android, and have librewolf for the desktop.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Firefox for iOS ist based on WebKit like Safari. Mozilla stopped porting Gecko over to iOS years ago as Apple's policy doesn't allow anything other that WebKit browsers. Even Google Chrome on iOS uses WebKit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I don't actually care what backend engine is used (in fact, I have long argued that Mozilla would be better off maintaining a fork of Chromium, and concentrating their effort on keeping good security and privacy features, rather than duplicating work rendering components and implementing JavaScript methods). I care about how my data is used and about the convenience of the experience with features like syncing. If I use Firefox/Waterfox only on my computers, but Chrome on Android and Safari on iPadOS, I don't get synced tabs and bookmarks.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago

Independent browser engine developers have a say in how web standards evolve. their influence is limited of course, but they use it to keep web open. Google have long been trying to integrate more "advanced" advertisement and data collection technologies directly in web browsers (including imposing it on non-Chromium browser through "open" web standards).

The moment Google has full control of technologies involved they will do everything in their power to make ad blockers technically impossible (or at least extremely complicated and inefficient) and data collection mandatory, integrated directly in Chromium. And they will do so in such a way that most websites will simply not work on Chromium forks with these "features" disabled, so everyone will be forced to comply.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Waterfox and IronFox are both on Android. I'm not aware of any Firefox forks for iOS, but I've never really looked into it, either. All Firefox forks that I'm aware of are compatible with Firefox Sync. If you don't trust Mozilla's Firefox Sync service (and personally, I think it's fine: being end-to-end encrypted, Mozilla can't see what you have in Sync regardless), you can also self-host your own Firefox Sync server.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

All Firefox forks that I’m aware of are compatible with Firefox Sync. If you don’t trust Mozilla’s Firefox Sync service (and personally, I think it’s fine: being end-to-end encrypted, Mozilla can’t see what you have in Sync regardless)

Ah thanks for this. That's really good to know. I was a little concerned that syncing your tabs in Firefox might be precisely one of those things that they're talking about with this new update.

you can also self-host your own Firefox Sync server

Oh, that's really cool! Do they have a Docker image for that? (Or even better, a Synology package?)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Oh, that's really cool! Do they have a Docker image for that?

Yep, a Docker image, instructions in the readme: https://github.com/mozilla-services/syncstorage-rs#running-via-docker

[–] whaleross 1 points 20 hours ago

I don't know but I doubt it, considering they are privacy oriented and it would be counterproductive to have your data shared to some other third party.

[–] TheGiantKorean 2 points 20 hours ago

Giving this a try now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 20 hours ago

There is always Dillo...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

Labybird is currently in development and it's separate from both Chromium and Firefox

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

yea buts backed by shopify.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 21 hours ago

Right but it’s not even something one can use or download right now or in the short term so it’s kind of not even worth considering at the moment.