this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
584 points (98.3% liked)

196

17009 readers
2143 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

I'm mixing up some loose mathematical / set theory vocabulary with imagery of a sexy time.

If you have an infinite number of gay men with dicks in other men's butts, stacked, in sequence, on an infinite sized floor or bed...

The straight version of this is guy gal guy gal pairs forever, with the gals having strap-ons in the guys asses, and the guys having their dicks in I guess either the gals pinks or stinks.

A 'constraint' is very loosely in set theory / math terms ... basically a way of saying... these formulas work, this equation has existing solutions, but only if we 'constrain' some of the factors.

So I am 'constraining' the vast amounts of people who are just straight, to people who are straight and also kinky enough to jump into the strap on / pegging conga line.

Unironically, that doesn't involve any homo, as no gals are touching gals, and no guys are touching guys.

EDIT: Its sort of a very simple kind of aperiodic tiling.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aperiodic_tiling

Why, yes, I am both autistic and have a dirty mind, how could you tell?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Beans please.

We do beans around here, apparently, rofl.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

i knew it, i felt it, sp3ctr4l is a reference to Spectral Theorem. Every real, symmetric matrix is diagonalizable.

[–] daggermoon 2 points 3 days ago

I think I misunderstood the original comment. I retract my previous statement.