politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
The "undecided" people were always decided. Decided against genocide, always were, always will be. You want them to learn ... learn what, exactly?
We all told Harris how to win and she refused to take our advice. Even now she can't admit that she screwed up... Or maybe she actually believed her pro-genocide stance was a good one, and if so, good riddance.
Really, decided against genocide so they campaigned to let a neo Nazi win. That's some solid reasoning there, maybe learn to not cut off your nose to spite your face.
As for Harris, yeah, her and the Democrats should learn to listen to the people but if you seriously think she was pro-genocide, well there's no point in even taking at that juncture.
Either way, y'all made your choices, you cast your vote, you didn't have to deal with Harris any more, good luck dealing with Trump and how receptive he and his administration will be.
If she wasn't pro genocide, then it should've been easy for her to speak out against genocide, right?
Again, how receptive was Harris? Clearly there was no choice when it came to genocide. If something as horrific as genocide is non-negotiable, what makes you think either political party cares to work for the people on any other heavily lobbied issue?
Then clearly there was no choice for you. So be it, deal with the consequences now and accept the hand you dealt.
There was no choice for anyone. The situation was already getting worse and worse in Palestine and yet you think "trump is going to make it worse" was some sort of difference maker. You're running the same disingenuous line that democrats do, which is when they're in power they claim they're working on it but also that it's out of their hands, but when they're out of power they blame voters. It's apparently never the fault of democrats. You think after over a year of democrats doing jack and shit that somehow they'd do any better after getting reelected.
Please don't think you can fool anyone by claiming they were working towards a ceasefire when they were actively supplying billions in weapons during these "negotiations". Do not think you can fool anyone by claiming that democrats were holding back israel by delaying just a single shipment of weapons while letting the rest through (which was already more than enough of what they needed to "get the job done"). There's a saying about that and george bush, war criminal and dear friend of the democrats, put it so eloquently here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hl7FKfl3O2Y
For the record, I voted for harris, but I'm not stupid enough to think she would've made any difference because she indicated as much on the campaign trail during a critical election. The campaign trail is when politicians make promises they don't keep and yet she couldn't even be bothered to lie about caring.