1071
'Stop Playing Nice,' Says AOC as Senate Dems Help Approve Yet Another Trump Nominee
(www.commondreams.org)
this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2025
1071 points (99.2% liked)
politics
19787 readers
4735 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Fuck the democrats. Let's take BERNIE and AOC, and replace the rest in the next election.
That's part of what the republican partys done that's made them so successful. If your representatives don't represent you, primary them.
Shit, Democrats don't even give us a chance to primary, they just pick whoever they want.
In NJ, they had what was referred to as the county line, which would basically put the Democratic party's candidate first on a ballot. It was abolished this year, but the idea was that the positioning on the ballot made it easier for people to just vote down the line, but the result was that you didn't necessarily have a fair vote.
They're not even good enough. Both of them are turncoats. Bernie "the word genocide makes me quesy" Sanders is voting in Trump's nominees. AOC endorsed Kamala and reinforced the "working tirelessly for a ceasefire" bullshit, every two minutes she's folded on something new.
You know what, I'd take "not good enough" over "actively dismantling our democracy", but fuck me I guess
Great, so we're already "lesser of two evils"-ing our hypothetical new party designed to replace the Democrats. Just great.
Here's an idea. If we're replacing the Democratic Party, let's ONLY include people who aren't traitors. Can we find five or ten people like that amongst the American population of 330 million people?
Nah, I'm just saying you're being too picky. Right now, I don't really think there's anything wrong with rallying around a message of "Not Trump, Not Fascism". You know, considering those are the things that are currently dismantling our democracy.
Calling people turncoats when they should be considered allies does nothing to fight the real, current threat in office. All this infighting just sets us back and puts us further down the road to fascism. This quest for the perfect liberal party is a waste of effort because it's so pie-in-the-sky and borderline impossible to actually achieve in any meaningful length of time.
It sucks, but that's reality. Our democracy is fucked, and trying to find even more idealist liberals to replace the likes of Bernie and AOC isn't gonna fix it.
I could not have been more clear - I completely reject the idea that we should be preemptively compromising our morals in a hypothetical new party designed to replace the morally compromised Democratic party. This is literally INSANE. Like, can we as a society even brush our teeth without compromising with the perpetrators of genocide and global empire? You're already PLANNING a moral compromise for a political party that doesn't even EXIST yet?
K good luck making any progress or solving any problems whatsoever then*. One day you might realize that the real world is shitty and messy and requires compromise.
The moral compromises we're talking about are literally giving up on solving problems preemptively. You're talking about making plans for the future, designing new things from scratch, you have every tool in the world at your disposal, a blank canvas, and you take a huge paintbrush and dip it into a whole house-sized can of black paint and just start smearing it everywhere.
Nah, if anything, your "absolutely no compromises" approach is the one smearing black paint all over everything. That level of inflexibility and brittleness will only get in the way of actually accomplishing things.
Right, I'm sure the current situation is better than endorsing Kamala...
Okay but she endorsed Kamala, and we are still in the current situation?
I disagree with dx1, and think they are worth keeping around, but the criticism that they fell right in line with a genocidal regime, and refused to stand for their principles is fully true.
So between the two options available to her: try to get Kamala elected or increase the likelihood of Trump being elected, which do you think was the better option to pursue?
I mean I disagree, but I am curious. Who then?