this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
588 points (98.7% liked)

Facepalm

2757 readers
6 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NikkiDimes 117 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Guessing it says "kill"? I feel people who are that vocal about pedophiles are usually compensating for their own internal demons. Someone should keep an eye on that man...

[–] Majorllama 9 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I really hate that line of thinking. I get why people make that comment, but I really hate it either way. Just because some people who vocally take one stance doesn't mean they are always secretly in support of it behind closed doors. I know it does happen, but applying that logic to everyone is just wrong.

If we expand that type of thinking to others does that mean that Lemmy users are overwhelmingly Nazis because they have been so outspoken against them? They must be hiding their love of Elon and Trump just because they keep talking about how much they hate them all the time. Clearly projecting.

Unless you have legitimate reason to believe someone has ulterior motives behind their words or actions you need to assume they are being truthful. Innocent until proven guilty n all that.

[–] a9cx34udP4ZZ0 87 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Let me make it easy for you: The local CPS agent who has to both uncover pedophiles, as well as deal with the aftermath, would never be caught dead in a shirt like this.

Anyone wearing a shit like this is projecting HARD. Normal people universally agree that pedophiles are bad. The only people that feel the need to advertise it's bad, are the ones who secretly are thinking "But I have these urges so other people must too, so I better put it on a shirt to remind everyone it's bad in case they forget".

There's litearlly no well adjusted adult who thinks you need to remind everyone that pedophiles are bad... that's just a base assumption. If one of my coworkers showed up tomorrow with a shirt that said "Rapists are bad, don't rape people" my first thought would be: wait, were you contemplating raping people before you saw that shirt for the first time?

[–] Donjuanme 23 points 3 days ago

Me thinks the lady doth protest too much

Is a truism for a reason.

[–] mojofrododojo 9 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

There’s litearlly no well adjusted adult who thinks you need to remind everyone that pedophiles are bad…

eh, well adjusted is doing a lot of work there. I know victims, plural, who would happily join a lynch mob if it was going out to hang pedos. I think you have a point about projection, but like everything, there's few without-exception universals.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I know victims, plural, who would happily join a lynch mob if it was going out to hang pedos.

And would any of those people purchase and wear a shirt like this on a regular basis?

[–] mojofrododojo -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

guess what: if they did, I wouldn't say shit.

you don't know what other people have been through. but you seem really confident in casting the pedo accusation around. reminds me of conservatives.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're dodging the question.

While we're on the subject of how people "tell me without telling me" This trait you've displayed speaks to low emotional intelligence with the advice being, better to keep your mouth shut than remove all doubt.

[–] mojofrododojo -2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You’re dodging the question.

guess what fuckface:

I'm in no way obligated to engage with your bullshit. Your entitlement to my time is now revoked. Have a horrible life.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think the takeaway from this conversation can be: Don't wear shirts that talk about murdering anyone if you want to be perceived as normal and well adjusted, they're weird.

[–] mojofrododojo -1 points 2 days ago

yeah not advocating for that, nor defending the people pictured, but I know victims, and if they wanted to tear some pedo apart I would NOT stand in their way.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Nice. You double down and revealed yourself to be what you just claimed I am. Amazing display.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Or they are saying stero types are good and allowed now because they is all this is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

I was just watching an Explore With Us video about a guy who was VERY outspoken against paedos.

…he raped kids.

[–] jpreston2005 1 points 1 day ago

My first thought is "Methinks he doth protest too much."

My second thought, is maybe he's advertising his want to assist in this specific scenario, in which case, can I have his number?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago (2 children)

While I agree with this, I still think people who repeatedly bring up how opposed they are to something, apropos of nothing, are a bit strange and at best probably need to talk through some stuff.

Calling out your dislike of something when it's presented to you is fine. A pattern of interrupting unrelated conversations to do so is a bit worrisome.

[–] MothmanDelorian 3 points 3 days ago

Bingo, if I unprompted went on a rant about my disdain for Calvinism it would be out of place and fucking weird whereas within a conversation of Christian theologies that missed the mark about the overall message a rant about Calvinism would make sense.

[–] Majorllama 5 points 3 days ago

I can agree with that somewhat. Time, place and how often it comes up would make me mildly suspicious of someone, but I feel like I often see people instantly jump there without any additional information.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot 3 points 3 days ago

If we expand that type of thinking to others does that mean that Lemmy users are overwhelmingly Nazis because they have been so outspoken against them?

Would they overwhelmingly support waving a crooked "X" around? No. Would they support a tyrannical system maintained through fear and violence where people are separated into in-groups and out-groups (and excuses are always found to put the most vulnerable people into the out-groups) and mass executions of those out-groups are considered acceptable? Unfortunately, all signs point to "yes".

[–] TheLowestStone 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like you have something to hide.

[–] Majorllama 10 points 3 days ago

I can't tell if you're trying to be funny or if you actually are doing the thing right now lol