this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
161 points (90.5% liked)

politics

19393 readers
4045 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fandangalo 23 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I’m more aligned with Sanders than the democrats. D just feels like neoliberalism protected by identity politics when we need to focus on class issues. Lots of working people can get behind the same idea of wealth inequality. Identity politics has fragmented the focus. I don’t give a shit about Target/rando corp having rainbow clothes: when lots of people cannot afford the clothes, then that’s a problem to solve.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The problem is that there are people who really fucking care about those rainbow clothes. And those people don't think a subset of our population should exist. That's why it's something to give a fuck about.

You don't have to be gay to give a shit about these things. They're talking about ending marriage equality (or "leave it up to the states" which I'm sure won't lead to chaos when states decide not to acknowledge people's marriage certificates).

[–] Zombiepirate 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I agree with you that the Democrats need to focus on economic issues, but I'm not following on the "identity politics."

What did the Democrats propose to do about pride merch in Target?

[–] Fandangalo 7 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

It’s less about what they did than didn’t do. There’s been inroads made because of identity politics, but now it feels somewhat pointless. Instead of being the “big tent” party, the Dems are the party of many tents. That means working class people look at it, say, “I’m not part of some special group, so I don’t matter.” And they turn red or just “not Dems.” A lot of people didn’t have improvements in their lives over the last 4 years.

Absolutely, some groups are more negatively impacted by others, but systemic racism is invisible to many. Meanwhile, things are more expensive, salaries can’t keep up with inflation, we’re talking about trillionaires in 10 years.

I don’t identify as a democrat. They can talk all they want, but I have no faith in the party. I fit in several identity politics groups, but that doesn’t matter while people struggle with housing, food… it’s just a distraction to divide us further rather than focusing on the shared element that every day people are facing.

[–] Ensign_Crab 9 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

That means working class people look at it, say, “I’m not part of some special group, so I don’t matter.”

In fairness, there haven't been a lot of indicators that the working class matters to Democrats. In fact, they got a few very public demonstrations that when given the opportunity, Democrats will not act in the best interests of workers.

The problem isn't that Democrats defend trans people too much (because they fucking don't. They ran republican anti-trans hate in their own ads last election.) The problem is that Democrats don't also fight for workers.

Democrats should openly and viciously fight for every tent they (falsely claim to) represent. Not just the ones that are convenient at the moment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The Democrats are the incompetent defenders

[–] Ensign_Crab 2 points 4 hours ago

Incompetent implies that they tried and failed. Not failed to try.

[–] Fandangalo -1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I agree at the general prescription for the party. On a personal level, it’s starting to feel like a distraction, and maybe even a manufactured one.

[–] Ensign_Crab 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

On a personal level, it’s starting to feel like a distraction, and maybe even a manufactured one.

So we should just abandon every vulnerable minority on the grounds that protecting them or fighting for them in any way would just play into Republicans' attempts to distract?

[–] Fandangalo -2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Oh yeah! Definitely what I’m saying in good faith! /s

Focus on what an actual aligned group can: our class. We’d help those groups and more if we stopped doing this.

I say I agree with someone and I get bad faith questioning back.

[–] Ensign_Crab 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

It's only a distraction if you think solidarity can exist with only one group at a time. Or are looking for an excuse to drop solidarity with some groups because solidarity takes effort and involves treating voters as humans with agency.

[–] Zombiepirate 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm still not following then.

Why would you list pride merch in Target as one of the problems with the Democrats if that's not one of their problems?

Do you have anything to support this hypothesis that supporting vulnerable groups was what cost them the election instead of them being the party of the status quo? Or maybe I'm misunderstanding?

Like I said, I'm with you that they need to focus on economics that has an effect on people's lives. I just don't follow your other point.

[–] Fandangalo 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

It’s a joke because a bunch of people on the right got mad over Target.

This is an opinion. I’m okay with my feelings being wrong.

[–] Zombiepirate 0 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Then aren't you doing the thing you're complaining about? Choosing to discuss identity politics over economics?

[–] Fandangalo 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

I don’t want to talk about it. Other people are?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

It's ok to admit that your initial comment was perhaps made in haste, and you've since realized that you were wrong.

We're all adults here (presumably), and I think most of us here would appreciate the honesty. It's ok to be wrong... And it's even better to learn that you were wrong, and have a chance to remedy that.

Doubling down on something you know is bullshit just to save face is dumb. Who cares?

[–] Zombiepirate 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

But... You brought it up? Nobody else was talking about it.

Are you just disappointed that people are talking about it? Isn't it a bit unreasonable to demand other people avoid a subject that you don't like? You're free to not engage. I'm really just confused who you're talking about that is saying this stuff, especially since you said the Target thing.