Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
Whatever bad luck you're having with rentals is nothing compared to how badly home ownership can go, renting isn't all that bad even if it is more expensive. What's really expensive and financially distressing is a sudden and expensive furnace / roof replacement, flooding, fire, the list goes on
Mortgages aren't going away anytime soon, start off with renting and see where that takes you before jumping into a $400,000+ loan
Well that's a super nuanced answer though.
IF OP can afford a house AND can keep enough emergency savings to deal with an issue, it may still be better to buy. Rental money is just gone forever in exchange for not assuming any risk on the property, but it retains no value.
If OP can't afford to buy at all, this post is stupid, so the question is really if there's no money left for emergencies. In which case, the obvious answer is keep renting because a single point of failure pushing you out of your house is a bad proposition.
If there's SOME money.... It just depends on the house. Some of the failure points are covered by inspection, but it could be risky. Better to not max out your ability to borrow if at all possible.
First few years are spent in interest so it's also going straight to the bank
Equity is uncertain in this market, especially with unexpected maintenance
Rent comfortably for a few years is still the better choice, buying a house now that might fall in price is a terrible risk
Depends how much money you have an the mortgage length you pick. Every payment covers some principle and some interest. There is no situation where you get a house and then just pay interest. This is a lack of understanding of how payments work.
The first few years are overwhelmingly paid towards interest and not the principal, it's not an equal ratio throughout the mortgage. I think you missed some fine print
If you get into a mortgage then sell in 2 years you would have paid off less than 2 years worth of payments to the principal and you're not getting that money back, that's straight to the bank
"The first few years go to interest" and "the first few years are overwhelmingly paid toward interest" are not the same thing. The shorter the term, the smaller the total amount of interest paid is (and often the better the rates), and the more principal only payments you can make the lesser the interest paid.
Of course interest fraction is different by payment, but it's not as though the first payments you make are a lost cause: mortgage payments are always contributing to your ownership, rent payments never are. It's only a question of liquidity in the moment. Depending on the OPs situation rent could be more than a mortgage payment, in which case I know which I'd rather pay (as long as I could afford the insurance) if I wasnt planning to move right away.
A question of liquidity over decades with the liability of a big repair, and all for the hope of building equity and not paying rent in 20+ years
I'm paying more in rent than many of my friends with mortgages yet somehow their payments are shooting up with the rate changes, things are constantly needing repair and they're stressed beyond belief
Not a problem here in the states: mortgage rates are fixed. Also once you put some equity in, you can usually leverage it. But it really depends on your personal circumstances.