Ask Lemmy

27160 readers

2770 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

220

Are you in support of UBI? (self.asklemmy)

submitted 22 hours ago by Zeon to c/asklemmy

131 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hello, I'm not that informed about UBI, but here is my arguement:

Everyone gets some sort of income, but wouldn't companies just subside the income by raising their prices? Also, do you believe capatilism can co-exist with UBI?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

You don't have to lower UBI by income. Tax does it for you.

Pulling numbers out my arse, you band your tax until an income of 100k means they pay 12k in tax, essentially reclaiming the 1k/pcm they are paid by ubi. All while insuring they are never worse off than taking no pay rise, as they still have 88k to spend on luxuries.

Numbers subject to bitter argument.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Ugh, why give them money and then tax it again? That makes no sense.

We do that on America's Unemployment Income, and it seems ridiculous. Why give it, if you're just taking away some later?

[–] olafurp 2 points 4 hours ago

That's true. People shouldn't be discouraged financially from working. I haven't done I proper calculation of all cases of this and the total tax cost but for sure you could use the tax system to get the desired distribution.