this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
393 points (98.3% liked)

196

16985 readers
1474 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

(i lied)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] latenightnoir 48 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (10 children)

Honestly, I think it's OK to hold a bit of both beliefs and have that dissonance generate a sort of shame-tinged discomfort.

Violence should, by any rational and reasonable measure, be avoided. But that doesn't mean that violence isn't necessary at very specific points. To be more specific, the threat of violence can be a powerful equaliser when faced with aggressive, unrelenting abuse wrapped in denial.

We still shouldn't glorify it, though. Snitches get stitches in this not related to current events context, because a show of force is sometimes* necessary to establish the veracity of said threat. But we shouldn't forget that murder is murder, even when the murdered was a murderer.

[–] inv3r510n 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Violence should be avoided, which is why our healthcare system needs to be replaced by a single payer universal system like the rest of the developed world. The current system is violence. social murder is violence.

[–] latenightnoir 7 points 2 months ago
load more comments (8 replies)