Ask Lemmy
A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]
Rules: (interactive)
1) Be nice and; have fun
Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them
2) All posts must end with a '?'
This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?
3) No spam
Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.
4) NSFW is okay, within reason
Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected].
NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].
5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions.
If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.
Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.
Partnered Communities:
Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu
view the rest of the comments
Hmmh, I was more loosely applying that to the issue at hand. Not saying capitalism is inherently malicious... But that it comes with downsides. Like precluding collective progress for individual gain. And being inherently unfair. And that an external observer might not necessarily attribute that to morals. But maybe think we just can't do any better. Probably because of intelligence or psychology/human nature. That'd be far more likely and prevent any further discussion. I.e. we could strive for fairness, but be intellectually unfit to do it.
And I forgot the word for it, but there is a difference between how something is supposed to be and how it actually is. Maybe humans know/like other morals, but for some reason they don't apply. That'd be hard to judge. On the other hand you certainly can tell things about people by how they act...
I think it'd be like one of the Star Trek TNG episodes where Q tests their moral judgement and concludes humanity is not ready yet. I think they did a good job picturing this. Q sets arbitrary and incomprehensible standards and benchmarks. At least from human perspective. And that's because an alien is very different. And we can't understand the reasoning of a higher intelligence. So either way, a higher intelligence alien will likely attribute something unintelligible to us.
That or the alien will simply scour all life from the planet and then strip mine it for resources. They don’t even have to be more intelligent than us. Suppose they were roughly equivalent to human intelligence but had an insect-like eusocial behaviour with a billion year old culture. They could be far more advanced than us simply due to the availability of time.