this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
233 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19168 readers
4028 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justice-department/legal-experts-say-charges-hunter-biden-are-rarely-brought-rcna90191

 "It insults the intelligence of the American people to compare misdemeanor tax charges to a scheme to steal Top Secret documents and obstruct justice when the government asked for them back," he tweeted, comparing the charges against Hunter Biden to the recent federal indictment against former President Donald Trump. "If anything, Hunter Biden was treated harshly — those crimes are rarely charged."

[–] givesomefucks -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Tax charges?

He was a crackhead that illegally bought a gun after lying on federal forms and then abandoned the gun in a trash can where it was gone by the time his wife found it...

Now, I'm not a CPA, but how is that a "tax charge"?

If anything, Hunter Biden was treated harshly — those crimes are rarely charged.”

I do appreciate that quote literally using Trump's own excuse for tax fraud tho...

But you should but an /s or something or people will think you actually believe what the quote claims.

[–] jordanlund -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The gun indictment was revealed as part of his tax investigation.

Kinda like when they investigated Clinton for Whitewater and found out he lied about a blowjob.

In both cases, the crimes are rarely prosecuted. The only reason they were prosecuted was because Clinton is Clinton and Hunter is Hunter.

[–] givesomefucks 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The reason the gun charges are rarely prosecuted is most people aren't dumb enough to admit it in an autobiography and do book tours talking about and verify you did in fact break federal gun laws...

Most people wouldnt do that because they're afraid of prison.

Hunter Biden wasnt, even though his dad promised not to pardon him and that "no one is above the law"

And now he's pardoned. Either Biden was always going to do this and lied to us, or the US president just got punked by his adult son in a way I thought only Netenyahu could punk him.

I'm honestly not sure which would be worse.

Which do you think happend?

  1. Biden lied and was always going to do this

  2. A geriatric man just got manipulated by his adult crackhead son

  3. Mystery answer you havent came up with yet

Because it's hard to act like it's because of the charges being bullshit now when they're the same charges as when Biden said he was staying out of it.

The only thing that changed is Joe and Hunter both expected Joe's DOJ to let Hunter off

[–] jordanlund -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
  1. Biden was willing to let the charges stand right up until Trump got elected and started talking about how he was going to pardon everyone from 1/6 onward.

"Oh, so he's going to abuse pardon power? Fine, fuck it, Hunter gets a pardon."

[–] JustZ 1 points 2 days ago

Close but missed it.

Biden was willing until Trump won because with Trump running the DOJ, letting the DOJ have custody of Biden's son is a massive national security risk.

That was never going to happen.