this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
466 points (97.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9683 readers
1522 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
466
Wank tank confirmed (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/fuckcars
 

BTW the tank has a better forward view than the truck

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RedIce25 37 points 14 hours ago (6 children)

I can't understand why someone would want that large of a car

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Otherwise it wouldn’t fit the owner’s inflated ego.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 57 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (4 children)

It’s not even good for truck stuff. All that lift kit is extra weight and puts the bed too high to load stuff into it without a crane.

It’s also really expensive so you’re not gonna fuck it up when off-roading, though those wheels and tires aren’t off-road ready.

ETA: It's not even artistic. A low rider isn't good for anything but they look great. Sometimes art can be a reason. But this is just a giant, ugly, beige piece of crap with hideous wheels.

It’s an entirely useless vehicle that isn’t good for anything and I hate it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

lift kit = extra weight, bed too high

The weight added by a lift kit is a rounding error on the weight of the vehicle
Beds are too high from the factory so this doesnt actually matter

Offroading

This style is not built to go offroading

Not artisitic

Not up to you. People are allowed to like things.

Get better, defendable arguments.

These trucks suck to drive, ride like shit, get poor fuel economy, pollute the planet (especially after emissions equipment is deleted), but most importantly are unsafe to be on the road: they barely fit in the lanes, the view out of them is abysmal, and are extremely heavy which makes them unsafe in a collision.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod -2 points 8 hours ago
[–] FireRetardant 9 points 12 hours ago

Not to mention the borderline useless low profile tires. The bead would probably slip off the rim on a bumpy cottage road, i can't even imagine how poorly they'd perform in real offroad conditions.

[–] dejected_warp_core 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It’s also really expensive

This is the reason. Conspicuous consumption is a pox on us all.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 6 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Conspicuous consumption has been a thing for a really, really long time. But at least in previous time periods the things they were consuming at least were interesting to look at. Now it's just mass-produced bullshit that doesn't even look good. For fuck's sake: They're selling stained and ripped jeans for hundreds of dollars!

Bring back codpieces and fancy frilled collars! Bring back ornate brocade and gold detailing! Bring back ornate architecture! If you're going to exploit us for our labor at least make things that look good!

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce 4 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

It's good for making the owner forget they have a micropenis for a short while.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Could we stop using "micropenis" and the likes as insults? There are many men with small dicks who aren't insecure assholes.

[–] lettruthout 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Agreed. Moving away from body shaming, here are a couple of names for such a huge vehicle: Pavement Princess, Emotional Support Vehicle.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Just to be pedantic and nit picky, if we want to move away from insulting body features I feel that moving to insulting gender isn't a great thing to move to. Pavement Princess as a pejorative is mostly relying on our assumptions of princesses, end by extension the female side of the species, being delicate and useless.

Just a thought, I've used the term myself, though I wish I could find a better one. ESV might be the one I go to in the future.

[–] lettruthout 2 points 9 hours ago

Good point, I'll stick with ESV instead.

"Smart people listen to smart people and are open to change."

[–] snausagesinablanket 3 points 13 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 14 hours ago

I know right?

The tank is obviously better for the commuter.

[–] jewbacca117 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Right? If I'm going to get a vehicle that big it better have a 120mm cannon at least.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

And come up to traffic ahead? What traffic? You just keep going!

[–] ohwhatfollyisman 1 points 8 hours ago

society has made us see cars more as a statement of one's image rather than an object of utility.

this is also why luxury brands thrive in general -- because there exist people with more money than sense.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

Insecure little boys generally