If it's identifiably furry then it tells me something about you and your sexual preferences that I didn't want to know. The same if you had a Bad Dragon sticker or an Ahegao sweatshirt. Just because it doesn't have explicit nudity doesn't mean it's not sexual and doesn't mean it's appropriate.

Y'all want to do things anonymously on the internet, great. Y'all want to have conferences or get together in spaces that support that, also great. You should absolutely have those spaces. But so many furries that I've met overshare about it. Don't use your fursona as your work profile pic. Don't tell me you're a furry when I didn't ask anything remotely related. Don't openly thirst over Judy Hopps. Ain't nobody going around saying "I like tentacles and I'm proud of it" - take a note.

[–] chaonaut 9 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Another day, another sensationalization of the sexual aspects of a queer subcultures. If it's not the "inherent sexualization of discussing gay people", or trans people as "autogynephillia and autoandrophillia', it's furries or kink at pride. It's really disheartening hearing the same tools of oppression being deployed over and over again.

[–] Atlas_ -4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

How am I oppressing these people?

[–] chaonaut 5 points 4 weeks ago

Perhaps you might examine the various way in which queer people in general have been marginalized by labelling all their activities as obscene and sexual. For example, you might take the example of teachers in Florida who are in a same-sex marriage being prohibited from mentioning their marriage lest they be sanctioned for sexual content, while teachers in straight marriages were under no such restrictions. Similarly, the existence of queer people itself has been deemed so sexual by some that even mentioning to a child who is struggling with their identity that queer people exist has been called--in all absence of reason--child abuse.

If you can take those example, and then consider that your perspective of furries, much like homo- and transphobes' perspective of queer people, is skewed to view it as entirely sexual despite all the parts that aren't and classify the parts that would be normal sexuality in any other subgroup as deviant. This, as you might be able to deduce, can be quite restrictive of those people's "allowed" place in society.

load more comments (22 replies)