Ask Lemmy

26644 readers

4897 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Is capitalism the problem or is it neopotism (cronyism) invalidating the meritocracy? (self.asklemmy)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Clinicallydepressedpoochie to c/asklemmy

127 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

You refuse to acknowledge i never brought up worker safety in the first place.

[–] webadict 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You did.

I tend to disagree with this, not that it's entirely incorrect, but I think quality can't be disregarded; can the product be made safely is another factor

Meritocracy was shown to be related to the ability to generate capital because capital is economic power and allows you to concentrate more power. Quality didn't factor in because consumers buy bad products. Safety didn't factor in because consumers buy unsafe products. The best childcare workers aren't paid more than an average software developer because it's not meritocratic for workers.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

can the product be made safely is another factor

This is not a direct line to worker saftey or some sort of moral concern.

The exact following line is:

These aren’t smoke screens that some capitalist business man made up to trick you into thinking they are altruistic. These are things that might that effect bottom line.

My next argument would be you would merit very little when it comes to business acumen.

[–] webadict 1 points 4 days ago

You keep going in circles. Whose safety? The fact that it is related to the bottom line DIRECTLY contradicts yourself, that safety is only a concern as related to the money, because the money is the only concern, and that money flows to the owner.

You can call my acumen bad, but I'm just using historically very successful businesses and their complete and utter neglect for worker, consumer, and environmental safety.