this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
332 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3300 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ServeTheBeam 215 points 1 month ago (6 children)
[–] dhork 118 points 1 month ago (2 children)

When rumors started that he might be incontinent, his supporters started wearing diapers in solidarity. I don't think anything will deter them.

[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Yeah, when people call MAGA a cult it’s not an exaggeration. These people are brainwashed to the core. They were parading around in diapers over a rumor that he might be incontinent! That’s not even remotely close to a normal reaction to unpleasant gossip. Normal would be simply dismissing it out of hand because at the end of the day there isn’t really any proof.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

And yet they were the ones so adamant they would never wear a "chin diaper" during Covid.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Even if it was true, I wouldn't consider incontinence a disqualifier for public office. If it doesn't impair their ability to genuinely consult experts, I don't think physical issues should matter.

He has far worse problems.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I'm pretty sure there's plenty of proof at this point.

[–] Makeitstop 17 points 1 month ago (3 children)

His die hard supporters will go along with almost anything. I do think there's a line somewhere that he could cross that would cause some of them to leave, but every time some new thing comes up and they go along with it, that line moves a little farther away.

However, he needs more than just the flavor-aid connoisseurs to win an election. A lot of the people who vote for him will be doing so simply because the feel like things aren't great and want a change. They will vote while holding their nose, or just ignoring all the insanity around Trump because after a while it turns to white noise.

Convincing those voters that Trump isn't going to be a better alternative is possible, and it's probably easier to convince them Trump is old and unfit than it is to win them over on policy arguments. Way too many people vote (or not) based on vibes, and this line of attack works on that level.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

I'm mostly concerned that the media has immunized too many people to his madness such that they effectively chose trump years ago and haven't at all reevaluated that decision because the media has been sane-washing everything he does.

[–] Cryophilia 5 points 1 month ago

I do think there’s a line somewhere that he could cross that would cause some of them to leave

Apparently that line was telling his supporters to mask and vaccinate.

[–] Dainterhawk999 1 points 1 month ago

An ever changing ceiling based only on the info provided through the media without any self analysis based on any facts.

[–] TipRing 33 points 1 month ago

Remember, going negative is an effort to suppress turnout for the opposition. Trump voters are much more likely to wait until election day to vote, she gets extra time to convince them to just stay home, to not overcome everyday obstacles or just focus on other things.

If thinking about Trumps failing mental health makes a potential Trump voter uncomfortable, they might just be a little too busy or too tired or too stressed out about other things to deal with the cognitive dissonance of going to the polls to choose him.

It doesn't need to work on a lot of people, but shaving off a fractional percent in key states could make a big difference.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Ya know how when you're high, and someone says some dumb shit that shouldn't be funny, but it hits just right and you crack up?

His brain rot fans are hearing lots of stuff that hits just right because they share a wavelength

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Must be like that. Watched a televised rally with a guy and after a few minutes he looks at me and says "So, what do you think?" And I'm like "what even was that incoherent nonsense?". Trump said three goddamn conflicting things in one sentence. Complete horshit. I couldn't fucking believe this guy.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We're so close to snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

It's almost like we've seen it before.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We can make it matter by using it as a motivation for action

Find opportunities to volunteer for dems around you and online

[Write letters to voters in competitive downballot races (or swing states too)(https://votefwd.org/)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago