this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
420 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

58748 readers
5207 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sanctus 225 points 2 days ago (3 children)

None of this would be a problem if the government didn't sell us out for what we already paid for and allowed these vultures into the system. It should have be national from the start. It costs them about nothing to have data run through those lines. All those caps exist purely to garner profit.

[–] rottingleaf 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

There's a better idea really. Let the government not take money from the budget on infrastructure. Let it not give that money to companies, whatever the conditions.

Let it just fine to the ground those ISPs who prevent competition in their areas.

You know, sometimes you only need a gun and can do without that kind word.

It's a profitable business, so if competitive environment is created, there will be infrastructural improvements.

It's not government's job to directly finance private businesses.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Mostly correct take IMO. I don't blame ISPs for trying. I blame government (and not necessarily just federal) regulations/regulators for allowing it.

I grew up in NY. We paid a boatload in taxes to make fiber happen everywhere. IT. NEVER. HAPPENED.

NY is strongly Democrat. Acting like Republicans are solely the problem is asinine, and nothing stops states from enacting their own laws within the state. If California and NY made it happen. Guess what would basically happen throughout the whole country?

[–] Cyteseer 2 points 22 hours ago

I would just say, I do blame ISP's for trying. It's unethical to try and squeeze every cent out of your customers, community and country. It's never just "business". Businesses are operated by people while exploiting people. It's not a cold hearted machine doing the thinking, it's normal people making these unethical decisions.

[–] Sanctus 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah point to me where I said this was the fault of the Rubes? Because I didn't say that. This was a joint captilistic operation to severe untold amounts of wealth from the working class. You paid all them taxes and nothing happened because the ISPs decides to pocket the public funds instead of doing anything and the government let them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah point to me where I said this was the fault of the Rubes? Because I didn’t say that.

I didn't say you did... But the original article DOES try to paint it all on the Republicans. You know...

FCC Republican opposes regulation of data caps with analogy to coffee refills

I was taking your point and adapting it specifically to my thoughts on the original article.

[–] Sanctus 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can only agree with the original article. The internet is a series of tubes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nah it's more like a Starbucks

[–] Sanctus 1 points 20 hours ago

I said that because that was a Republican argument against Net Neutrality a little while back. Hmm, why are Republicans always against Net Neutrality? Hmm..