Cyteseer

joined 4 months ago
[–] Cyteseer 3 points 3 weeks ago

I would just say, I do blame ISP's for trying. It's unethical to try and squeeze every cent out of your customers, community and country. It's never just "business". Businesses are operated by people while exploiting people. It's not a cold hearted machine doing the thinking, it's normal people making these unethical decisions.

[–] Cyteseer 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Reverse threads on gas cylinders are (as far as I know) only used for flammables.

[–] Cyteseer 4 points 1 month ago

Do you think regulations are just blanket authoritarian actions. Sometimes we need government intervention to ensure and protect people's rights.

[–] Cyteseer 13 points 2 months ago (5 children)

What interests does Jill Stein actually represent for the people? The green party has never held a local office and she only ever pops up during the election for fundraising. If the green party actually did anything aside from campaigning for the presidency, no one would have this criticism.

[–] Cyteseer 7 points 2 months ago

An alternative, if an alternative could ever even be viable, would just be open to the same corruption and greed. We need regulation and laws to protect privacy and data. Regulate it such that companies are not allowed to retain private and unconsented data without severe legal or financial penalties. Severe enough that companies or individuals that abuse the rights of people are either shut down and dissolved or jailed.

[–] Cyteseer 19 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Not much to go on, get evaluated by a psychiatrist and then work on getting either or both medicines or therapy to help you manage it.

Unless you have something more specific that you can say about why you think that you have ADHD or if there's something you need help with, that's about as far anyone can tell you.

[–] Cyteseer 28 points 3 months ago

You could have literally looked a bit into to see that neither him or his wife have any investments of any kind aside from pensions, instead of writing something like this.

[–] Cyteseer -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

"ai" also has the advantage of billions of years of evolution.

[–] Cyteseer 4 points 3 months ago

How are you able to believe that. Is there some sort of concrete evidence that everyone else is missing or is it a gut feeling justification?

The international boxing association Russian president claimed that the DNA results showed two athletes had xy chromosomes but never published the results. That claim only came after Imane, an Algerian boxer, defeated the Russian boxer Azalia, and the claim was used to disqualify Imane's victory.

Of all the conspiracy theories, isn't it more reasonable that the Russian president wanted to protect the Russian boxer and made up a reason to DQ Imane to ensure that his home country wasn't stained by a loss?

[–] Cyteseer 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Imane is literally a cis-gender woman and there's no evidence that she is intersex, trans, or anything that indicates non-normative chromosome or hormone production.

It is completely fair for her to compete and it's just right wing people who are trying to claim and decide that she's not womanly enough to be considered a woman.

There are literally no trans people competing in the Olympics this year and only two non-binary competitors. This is all being posed as if the entirety of the Olympics is being skewed by trans competitors when there aren't any and this controversy is just being invented for the sake of affirming control over women.

[–] Cyteseer 10 points 3 months ago

Even within the field of physics, I find her a little questionable. She stated once that she thinks falsifiability is overrated. That just flys in the face of testability and verification, which opens up room for any untestable theory or hypothesis to take root.

[–] Cyteseer 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The "problem" is that gender is a spectrum and there doesn't exist any real metric to discern or categorize people into a social binary. Honestly, I'm surprised this topic is even popping up again when I thought this was hashed out several years and Olympics ago when right wingers were bringing this up back then. Trying to categorize and disqualify women by testosterone content just doesn't work. This is all ultimately a method of trying to police and control women's bodies.

In a similar vein, why aren't men looked at in the same manner. Why not say that any particular man either has too much estrogen and is either too womanly or not manly enough to qualify or compete. It's because these people aren't looking for fairness, safety, or any other dog whistle they might cry about. It's all just about controlling women.

view more: next ›