this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
1153 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

60083 readers
3597 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It feels dirty to agree with an ISP on something. But even the worst corporations are on the right side of something from time to time I suppose.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 230 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Internet shutoffs should require a court order. Not some emails that are "this person did a bad 🥺🥺🥺 no proof but can you please take our word for it 🥺🥺🥺🥺"

[–] [email protected] 200 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Internet shutoffs shouldn't be a thing, outside of non-payment or legitimate abuse. If I do something illegal, they should have to sue me, not shut off my internet.

[–] [email protected] 102 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, they don't disconnect a criminals phone service because they committed a crime and made a phone call. It makes no damned sense.

[–] this_1_is_mine 19 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Only happens as a matter by court order and is a limit on the person not on the corporations. Though if found out after by the court it can be ordered terminated. And you will face further punishment. But this is levied against the person. As in "You are not allowed to do a thing and if we find out you did the thing you will face further punishments." Corporations should not have the responsibility or ability to determine any ones eligibility. They are a businesses not a government.They are responsible for their own tos and should never be anything more.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

government.They are responsible for their own tos

Piracy almost certainly violates their TOS

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Actually, that's been done several times over the decades. As well as banning computer access. The guy caught hacking into the fbi gets his mouse and keyboard taken away.

[–] elephantium 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

If you do something illegal, you should be arrested.

Copyright infringement lawsuits are a far cry from bomb threats or the like.

[–] Jarix 30 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Not everything that is illegal is punishable by arrest

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah, I've been ticketed for speeding, and that certainly doesn't come with the threat of arrest unless I'm driving super recklessly or something (but that's a different offense altogether).

[–] elephantium 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

So you're saying copyright infringement is on par with speeding or parking past the meter's end? Eh, fair enough.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago

Honestly it is less severe than speeding. Copyright was an invention of the pre-digital era. Now that we all use computers, so many things we do every day are technically copyright infringement that it is absurd to even have these kinds of conversations.

[–] Jarix 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I was just pointing out a logical fallacy. It's literally impossible to do the thing you said.

This is just facts, they aren't an opinion

[–] elephantium -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Did you reply to the wrong comment?

[–] Jarix 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Maybe not a court order. But I could get behind a process similar to other utilities where you have months or warning and paperwork.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I had to process these requests at a company I used to work for. They do send "proof" (proof in quotes because you have to believe in good faith they didn't just make it up, which I have to believe they didn't).

We never shut anyone off though. We worked with business exclusively and only ever sent "scary" letters. Though we had one client that was a major music venue (a very known venue that's pretty famous) who would get these letters all the time. The irony was too much for me. I ended up calling them personally most of the time because it was too funny.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I remember getting a scary letter because I was torrenting. I thought it so funny because I had to the only person in the world only torrenting freeaoftwarr and public domain works.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] barsquid 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They don't give a shit about targeting accusations only towards people torrenting copyrighted stuff. Why would they? They have no consequences for being incorrect.

They are doing this automatically. They just grab all the magnet links they can find and target any IP they connect to, regardless of the content.

[–] A_Random_Idiot 26 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

They have no consequences for being incorrect.

Which is why the DMCA shit is also bullshit.

Multiple false claims should result in you being banned from making future claims.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

Add increasing penalties to that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

That's not how it would work for us. We'd receive a report from the MPAA/RIAA that showed the torrent they were downloading, the IP address involved, if they were seeding or leeching and an affidavit saying that all the information was correct to the best of their knowledge.

The letter we sent basically was a notification that we received that letter (with a copy) and that if we received two more for the same IP (three in total) we would have to release their information to the reporting body and that they could be open to legal action. It also included some information on how to secure their network and check for viruses in case that was the cause.

In my 15 years working there, we never once released information about a client. Because this was business accounts, most clients had multiple IPs (at least a /29) and would cycle what IPs they showed up as on the public Internet to keep them from getting multiple notices on the same IP. The music venue I mentioned had an entire /24.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I've never gotten a scary letter, and I've certainly torrented my fair share of stuff, both legal and otherwise.

The trick, I think, is to not use cable. I've had municipal fiber, Google fiber, DSL, and small local ISP (RJ45 hookup at the wall), and never once had an issue. The last one is probably annoyed at me because I tend to submit tickets and call them within a few minutes of my service going down (happens once/month or so). It's extra funny when they ask me to check my wifi settings on my router, and I tell them my router doesn't have wifi (it's a Mikrotik router, my AP is separate), and that my wifi is absolutely fine, it's the uplink that's busted (i.e. I can access all the stuff on my NAS).

I made a promise to myself that once I left the house, I'd never get cable. And that's a promise I've kept across multiple apartments and now my house. We're finally getting muni fiber, so I'm pretty excited.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's more likely you aren't using popular freely indexable trackers on currently airing popular media.

Try torrenting a current episode of a top 10 watched show within a week of release and see how fast you get one lol.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago

Yeah, I generally only torrent older media (like a few years old).

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don’t pirate these days, but when I did (and was stupid about it) the emails/letters had pretty exact evidence.

They included the name of the work, my WAN IP address at the time, and the amount of data transferred (uploaded) out from it.

This was in the US and I’m unaware of how such notices work in other countries that work similarly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's all they can get though they have no proof it was actually you and not someone else using your Internet, how they find out is they join the public trackers and just log everyone in it generally even without a VPN on private trackers they have no idea what you are doing

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

I think their goal is to tie the evidence to the ISP account, not necessarily name exactly who was pirating that work.