this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
933 points (98.8% liked)

196

16710 readers
2562 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (3 children)

"Minority" in this context does not mean having a smaller population. Minority means a group of people that have been historically oppressed or persecuted.

Women are a special kind of minority because even though they make up the majority of population worldwide, they've faced oppression for centuries.

Another example would be white people in South Africa—even though they are a minority as a percent, they still aren't a minority because they don't face oppression.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

No, minority doesn't mean that. The phrase you want is disenfranchised groups.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Women are undeniably a minority when it comes to being represented in politics/media in general. It's only in recent history that women have had any meaningful presence in terms of representation in those regards.

They're a minority in terms of representation because of said disenfranchisement.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Most of humanity has faced oppression for millennia. Most of humanity still does to varying degrees. All genders and ages and colours of people.

I don't see how celebrating a literal English aristocrat - Ridley's family are landed gentry, she was born in literal Westminster - is a victory against oppression or is righting any wrongs.

Building bridges through society and fixing actual problems instead of playing oppression olympics and labelling everyone six times over would go much further towards actual equity.