Problem with "walkable" is it means you've gotta cram ~~5 million~~ tens of thousands of people into a couple of square miles; and I hate seeing people -- I love seeing cars.

[–] _stranger_ 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

If you want the opposite of walkable, move to Phoenix, AZ.

[+] kitnaht -13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

If I want the opposite of walkable, why would I move into such a population dense area? If I wanted the opposite of walkable, I'd move to the middle of nowhere, with nothing around; not one of the most population dense cities in America...

Phoenix is literally the 5th most populated city in the USA

[–] Mozingo 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Okay, so you're not complaining about the walkable part, you're complaining about the city part.

[–] _stranger_ 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Even then, it's easier to be a recluse in a city where you can get everything delivered and never leave your home.

If they move out to the middle of nowhere, they'll never see a car again, and will have no where to go anyway, so what's the point if they have to drive an hour to get groceries where there will definitely be people.