this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
345 points (97.8% liked)

196

16714 readers
2561 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] qaz 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

This is my reasoning:

  1. America has first-past-the-post voting
  2. That means the party with the most votes wins it all
  3. The republican (41.7%) and democrat party poll high, nothing comes close (40.4%) (next up is Kennedy at 9.1%) ~~and the last candidate that wasn't from either party was George Washington (1789 - 1797)~~, therefore a vote for another party is essentially meaningless.
  4. Therefore, either the Republican or Democratic Party win
  5. The candidates for both parties have been determined at this point and are highly unlikely to change unless any of them die, therefore either Trump or Biden wins.
  6. Therefore, all actions come down to 2 things: Increase the chance of Biden winning instead of Trump or don't

In my opinion, the only way to avoid each election coming down to damage control is to get rid of FPTP voting.

EDIT: The last candidate that wasn't from either party was not George Washington as [email protected] pointed out. It was Millard Fillmore (1850 - 1853).

[–] lemonmelon 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
  1. re: "last candidate ... George Washington"

I'm not entirely sure what point you're making, as there have been multiple other parties whose candidates were elected to the presidency, including the Federalists, the Whigs, and the Democratic-Republicans. Theodore Roosevelt received the second-most votes in the 1912 election as a third-party candidate for the Progressive (Bull Moose) party.

[–] qaz 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I was trying to argue that candidates that aren't from the Republican or Democratic party haven't been elected from a long time. I looked up the last independent candidate, somehow forgetting that there were more parties. That said, the other candidates are still from more than a century ago.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

No, you're still right.

The US has had two major parties for the entirety of its existence. Occasionally one of those two parties collapses and is replaced by another one, but even during these upsets it is always one of the old major parties (the one that didn't collapse) that has their candidate elected.

Furthermore, if you take every third party + every independent and combine all their congressional seats the most they've ever held was 36, and that was in 1833-1835.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election#Popular_vote_results

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Party_divisions_of_United_States_Congresses