"You shouldn't do [y] either, you idiot, you absolute fucking buffoon. You should instead do [z, which costs a fortune and/or requires you to restructure your entire life]"

[–] [email protected] 53 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Thread closed [x] already answered please go to link: completly unrelated topic actually about [a]

[–] rtxn 32 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And the link points to a solution from 2006 using a method that's been outdated and unsupported for a decade.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

somebody replies to it "Here's everything going wrong with [x]"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

But it will be slighly more efficient