this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
1768 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

60123 readers
2704 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gigan 78 points 7 months ago (9 children)

Wait really? What's the catch?

[–] PseudorandomNoise 190 points 7 months ago (7 children)

Doubt there is one. The hard truth is that most Americans' taxes are pretty simple and straightforward. We can stop pretending that copying some boxes from a W2 and a 1099 is difficult.

I mean, personally I wish we'd stop pretending that the IRS isn't already fully aware of what you owe and could just do the filling for you, like in other countries, but until Grover Norquist fucks off forever we're stuck where we are.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey 60 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Right. Filing taxes should only be necessary if you have itemized writeoffs or wish to contest the IRS's statement of your tax liability. They already know what you earned their your employer, what's been paid in taxes, what basic credits your qualify for, etc. They know what you owe so long as you didn't have expenses to apply for that they couldn't assume or know about. The only reason they don't already do that or, at least until now, have a free public system for filing, it's because tax companies have lobbied for decades to be able to milk the public for cash to help them file and navigate their tax liability.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The argument has been since free filing means only the wealthy will hire accountants, free filing would discriminate against the poor given a few mistakes will be made here and there.

I may not need to mention that disingenuous argument is made by the pirates at Intuit and their lobbyists.

[–] PseudorandomNoise 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

free filing would discriminate against the poor

As opposed to the current system where the richest among us can hire a whole team of accountants to find every deduction possible?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It should also be noted that if the vast majority of people do nothing special on their taxes and just accept the government's assessment, then that leaves a much smaller group of people to be audited. And a much larger portion of those people will be those who are trying to weasel their way out of paying their share. Right now, with the IRS being criminally underfunded, they only focus on low hanging fruit, the small fries. With those people being boiler plater auto-accepting tax payers, that would mean the IRS has no reason to audit them and can focus on the big boys where the real cheats are. That's another big reason we do not have that sort of system and why the IRS is currently so underfunded (despite every dollar spent on the IRS generating between 5 and 9 dollars in revenue from tax fraud/evasion). Those kinds of people pay to make sure it doesn't happen.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

The ick:

Those kinds of people pay to make sure it doesn't happen.

Greedy losers

[–] pdxfed 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Holy Christ someone using disingenuous appropriately, I'd almost given up on the word. Thanks for saving it!

[–] Caboose12000 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

How exactly is it usually misused? Its use here matches every other time I've seen it as far as I can tell

[–] pdxfed 2 points 7 months ago

I always see it being used in place or dishonest for people who think they are the same and feel it makes them sound more intelligent.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I can tell you’re being ingenuous and I believe you

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Oh didn’t know it was misused!

🍻

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They know what you owe so long as you didn’t have expenses to apply for that they couldn’t assume or know about

Solo 401ks/IRA also wouldn't be something they know about until you file if I understand correctly. Guess you could that expenses?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

They would go in the sections for 401ks and IRAs just like they do on the paper forms. The online form will have the same way to enter the additional deductions.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

They should (and do?) have the same information your employer, bank, or brokerage files. i.e. the same forms you use to fill out your taxes now. They know what you contributed to you 401k and your other retirement accounts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Solo 401ks are where you're the employer (guess technically there's some wiggle room for others to be in your 401k, but from the perspective of such a person, wouldn't it just be a normal 401k?). So you have to report it yourself. The brokerage firm holding it won't.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey 1 points 7 months ago

Well, yeah. If you're self employed, you have to report yourself too.

[–] Guy_Fieris_Hair -2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

I understand why we do out taxes in the current situation, kinda. If the irs just sent you a bill it would be ripe for people thinking they were getting ripped off. People hating taxes and thinking they're getting robbed is about as American as it gets. The whole boston tea party thing. People on both side doing the math holds people accountable. Also the current tax bracket situation kinda needs some end of the year math. Now, if it was a flat tax, a fixed percent... THAT EVERYONE pays no matter how much you make then it would be easy math. But they gotta make sure the middle class is paying 22% of their income to the feds and the billionaires pay one tenth of a percent.... you know.. for reasons. Then there are a billion write-offs and loopholes the rich can exploit, so they gotta keep those there.

If it was, say, 5% for everyone, no matter what you make, then it could easily just come out of your check as you get paid with no bs at the end of the year.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

A flat tax is a poor tax. 5% of your income means WAAAAY more to someone working minimum wage with two kids than someone who has a second home, even if dollars and cents it's way less. And the wealthy will evade a flat tax as much as they already do a progressive tax.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Now, if it was a flat tax, a fixed percent…But they gotta make sure the middle class is paying 22% of their income to the feds and the billionaires pay one tenth of a percent… you know… for reasons.

I fall into the lower end of the middle class (nationally) and my income tax is about 11%, but on top of that, after deductions and credits I end up deducting myself into the lowest tax bracket and collecting credits so I get a nice chunk back every year. To actually pay a full 22% of your income in income taxes, you must be making pretty good bank (and probably spending pretty good bank if you're still considering yourself middle class)

Flat taxes are extremely regressive. The whole idea of tax brackets is that those with more ability to pay pay more and those with less ability to pay pay less. If you only make 22k/year you need all of that and that $2200 can be pretty lifechanging, but if you make 220k per year you can live without that $22k. There's also fun stuff with how much tax revenue the government can actually bring in depending on who they tax harder, and generally it favors taxing the rich at a much higher percentage rate than they do the poor.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I've been in the US for a few years now. All my colleagues told me that doing taxes is hard. So I used to reluctantly pay money to do it through Sprintax. This year, I decided to do it by hand. It took almost the same amount of time as it would've taken to do it through Sprintax, which is around 30 minutes.

[–] EtherWhack 3 points 7 months ago

Even with multiple savings accounts, IRA/401ks, an investment account, and two W2s; it's still relatively straightforward. You just need to grab the forms, as they are legally supposed to be provided to you.

[–] Delta_44 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In italy the data is pre-filled, you just have to check if there's something missing and you're good to go, but you still have to send the module manually, like going into the website and doing the stuff.

It should be all automatic, wtf

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Don't they just assume that everything is good if you don't reply? Works that way here

[–] Delta_44 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's not a "reply", it's a thing that you have to do, so that if you owe the government something you'd pay it, elsa you'll receive money if the government owes you something (for example, a percentage of medical expenses gets "refunded")

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Here if you owe something you'll get basically billed for it and if you are owed they just inform you about it and pay it to your account. If you are owed or you're even then you don't have to do a thing. No confirmation, nothing to do, you can ignore the whole thing. Is it the same for you guys?

[–] Delta_44 2 points 6 months ago

Unfortunaly not 😂

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Grover Norquist fucks off forever

This is the world I want to live in.

[–] K1nsey6 2 points 7 months ago

most Americans’ taxes are pretty simple and straightforward

Once the reporting for income over $600 from shit like eBay sales, Venmo, etc kicks in, the 1099 they issue would make free filing ineligible

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

step one for me is get out last year's so i have a point of reference. just do the same thing again. numbers are a bit different, but the general 'what-goes-where' is usually the same--unless they split a form into multiple pages, or add an extra page to one.

once i get the new blank forms printed, it's about 15 minutes for me to fill-out, copy, and stuff inside an envelope. this year's added yet another sheet, i had to use a flat instead of the usual #10. cost more to mail, too, but i will not ever 'e-file'.

one of the few perks of being poor---easy taxes.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Unless it's changed from the pilot, it's only useful if you file a 1040EZ or take some really basic deductions. Anything beyond the basics, like any kind of investments, means you need to use a different tool.

But freetaxusa is still free for all but the most complex cases.

[–] triptrapper 13 points 7 months ago

From the article:

The pilot program targeted people with simple tax returns based on W-2 forms. In her remarks today Yellen said that over the next few years they will expand Direct File to support more situations.

[–] TeddE 8 points 7 months ago

But even that would cover a large percentage of the American workforce, and I imagine over a few years, it will grow to cover all users that don't need personal accountants. Progress is progress.

Personally, I hope this transitions into a system where they email you a proposed return and you do nothing to accept it (only needing to take action if there's an issue).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

I’d say it’s still a win, and I’m hoping they expand upon it.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago

I expect that you'll have to pay the money according to the statement

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 months ago

The catch is that Turbo Tax and H&R Block are gonna lose a ton of revenue

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You have to register an account with the 3rd party service ID.me that uses biometrics like facial recognition. Their privacy policy is horrendous.

The only reason I haven't used it this year.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Only catch is Republicans probably launching some type of legal action to try and stop it.

https://www.nysscpa.org/news/publications/the-trusted-professional/article/13-republican-ags-seek-to-stop-irs-s-fre-direct-file-pilot-program-020224

No lawsuit launched yet to my knowledge, just sternly worded letters saying please stop helping taxpayers instead of letting predatory companies like Intuit fleece money off of them.

I would expect them to try something soon though with this announced.

[–] apex32 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I was in a pilot state (Arizona), and I looked into it. It's only for federal taxes. You need to file state taxes separately.

There are already several online tax solutions that offer free federal and charge for state.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Does Arizona not have an online free system? Illinois has a very hand-holding guided set of questions and has for years, it's always been our federal taxes that make my head hurt to fill out via the IRS's FreeFillableForms site.

[–] Cocodapuf 4 points 7 months ago

It probably doesn't do state taxes.

[–] AreaKode 1 points 7 months ago

You get to pick which oligarch or corporation gets your tax money this year!