this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
1046 points (98.8% liked)

196

15693 readers
4771 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1046
๐Ÿ“„ rule (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

alt-textIt blows our hivemind that the United States doesn't use the ISO 216 paper size standard (A4, A5 and the gang).

Like, we consider ourselves worldly people and are aware of America's little idiosyncrasies like mass incarceration, the widespread availability of assault weapons and not being able to transfer money via your banking app, but come on - look how absolutely great it is to be European:

The American mind cannot comprehend this diagram

[Diagram of paper sizes as listed below]

ISO 216 A series papers formats

AO

A1

A3

A5

A7

A6

Et.

A4

Instead, Americans prostrate themselves to bizarrely-named paper types of seemingly random size: Letter, Legal, Tabloid (Ledger) and all other types of sordid nonsense. We're not even going to include a picture because this is a family-friendly finance blog.

Source: Financial Times

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] drmoose 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

8.5" is not any easier to divide than 297mm. Try dividing 8.5" by 8. What is that? 12 pebbles and 14 glibglobs each?

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[โ€“] drmoose 5 points 1 month ago

Ah yes - a system that uses both fractions and decimals!

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Don't bother, it seems the metric are allergic to fractions that aren't irrational.

^/s

[โ€“] Maggoty 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's 1.06 Which is close enough to just do 1 inch cuts. Super easy. No possible better way to do it.