setsneedtofeed

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
 

GatDaily article section on this gun, written by Travis Pike:

The rarest of the .30 Cal Thompsons is a .30-06 rifle variant that looks like an actual Thompson. It looks like the creators stretched a standard Thompson SMG to fit a .30-06 cartridge and magazine. The gun did use BAR mags with an added oil pad. The extreme pressure of the operation required an oil pad and lubricated ammo.

Only one of these experimental Thompsons exists, and it was made in 1943. It appears to be the only one and is, or at least was, privately owned. An old VHS uploaded to YouTube shows the most we know about the gun. The presenter explains that it is a blowback-operated firearm and used a delayed blowback, but not the Blish lock.

From what I can understand from the video, it uses some form of plunger-delayed blowback system combined with a strongly tensioned recoil spring. The collector wisely will not fire it due to the fact no one’s sure what will happen if you do. Will it explode? Will someone be eating a recoil spring? It’s too valuable to risk.

Link to YouTube footage.

27
Untitled (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 weeks ago by setsneedtofeed to c/artshare
 
87
submitted 3 weeks ago by setsneedtofeed to c/foodporn
 
4
submitted 3 weeks ago by setsneedtofeed to c/guns
[–] setsneedtofeed 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Awesome use of the pattern.

[–] setsneedtofeed 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Up and at them.

[–] setsneedtofeed 8 points 3 weeks ago

If we are looking at it from the cold business angle, there has to be an acknowledgement of the different audiences and the different ways that different kinds of entertainment are monetized.

A Disney movie goes into theaters to make money on its own, then it goes onto Disney+ as part of the big lineup. The main audience is children. Children don't have the kind of demand of franchises that adults do. It is much easier to get children to accept reboots.

That 2019 live action Lion King movie that nobody ever even talks about? It made a billion and a half in theaters. Why? Simple. It had animals and loud noises in it, kids don't need much more than that.

A Star Trek show is not going to be making any theater money. All the money spent on it is in the hope that it attracts enough subscribers to make the costs worth it. That's harder math and it's with a more niche and picky audience.

I was in the middle of writing up a lot of math, but the TLDR is that a TNG reboot is not as appealing as a new show. A TNG adjacent show can cash in on TNG memberberries while having the freedom to be creative to try and pull in new subscribers.

[–] setsneedtofeed 37 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (7 children)

TNG has aged well and despite some dated elements it is still within the comfort zone of modern audiences. TNG created the baseline for how following Trek shows for decades would look and operate which gives it a connection to all of those shows for people to grab onto. TOS is both older and of a significantly different wavelength. I personally love it, but a lot of people bounce off of it. That is why there is more openness to rebooting it. Also, the JJ Abrams movies have broken the seal, as it were, on the idea of recasting TOS characters, making it less of a major step. This is why people at large talk about it.

SNW also slowly and softly incorporated the building blocks for a TOS reboot spread out of time, rather than just dumping the idea out all at once. This assembly was made more palatable by fitting the process inside of a pretty good Trek show.

In terms of canon, it is much easier to introduce a TOS reboot than a TNG reboot. A lot of things in TOS have had to be explained away in convoluted ways or mostly ignored by the rest of the franchise. TOS is more ripe to be retuned with details that fit better into what Trek has become. TNG has a much tighter connection to the rest of the shows.

For what it's worth, I don't think either TOS or TNG should be remade. A new Trek show should always expand or move Trek forward in some way. I am tired of reboots, reimaginings, and rehashes.

[–] setsneedtofeed 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This isn't a productive area of discussion.

[–] setsneedtofeed 2 points 3 weeks ago

Christ lives to serve, and he is serving on those player haters.

[–] setsneedtofeed 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

At the moment. Parts were delayed at the depot.

[–] setsneedtofeed 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Those are frog goggles (frogoggles, if you will) to give multispectrum vision, much like but legally distinct from The Predator.

[–] setsneedtofeed 3 points 3 weeks ago

Oh shoot my Internet is terribly spotty. It showed me it loaded when I posted.

[–] setsneedtofeed 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Worldbuilding. No endgame to it, just building.

view more: ‹ prev next ›