Lemmy.World

169,227 readers
7,378 users here now

The World's Internet Frontpage Lemmy.World is a general-purpose Lemmy instance of various topics, for the entire world to use.

Be polite and follow the rules βš– https://legal.lemmy.world/tos

Get started

See the Getting Started Guide

Donations πŸ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Liberapay patrons

GitHub Sponsors

Join the team 😎

Check out our team page to join

Questions / Issues

More Lemmy.World

Follow us for server news 🐘

Mastodon Follow

Chat πŸ—¨

Discord

Matrix

Alternative UIs

Monitoring / Stats 🌐

Service Status πŸ”₯

https://status.lemmy.world

Mozilla HTTP Observatory Grade

Lemmy.World is part of the FediHosting Foundation

founded 2 years ago
ADMINS
1
85
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Xanderill to c/fuckcars
2
 
 

For critics of widening projects, the prime example of induced demand is the Katy Freeway in Houston, one of the widest highways in the world with 26 lanes.

Immediately after Katy’s last expansion, in 2008, the project was hailed as a success. But within five years, peak hour travel times on the freeway were longer than before the expansion.

Matt Turner, an economics professor at Brown University and co-author of the 2009 study on congestion, said adding lanes is a fine solution if the goal is to get more cars on the road. But most highway expansion projects, including those in progress in Texas, cite reducing traffic as a primary goal.

β€œIf you keep adding lanes because you want to reduce traffic congestion, you have to be really determined not to learn from history,” Dr. Turner said.

view more: next β€Ί