The internet is almost unrecognizable from what it was 20 years ago.
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
1321 points (98.0% liked)
Mildly Infuriating
35586 readers
901 users here now
Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.
I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!
It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
7. Content should match the theme of this community.
-Content should be Mildly infuriating.
-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.
...
8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.
-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.
...
...
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Profits run everything, and while I understand that, it does lend itself to a shitty experience for the user unless you pay for it.
To me it seems like the 2000s and 2010s when all those companies got massive and laid off middle management. Then those short sighted assholes got jobs elsewhere and poisoned those ponds.
Almost unrecognizable from just three years ago.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Lol. To be fair though Reuters business isn’t views it’s selling articles to other press.
Don't bring logic here, this is reddit! Wait. Oh no. Seriously though, not all sites with pay walls are applying the pay wall to every article. Some charge for opinions and business gossip while leaving true news that affects everyone open
load more comments
(1 replies)
You have reached your daily limit for Lemmy comments. To read more, please upgrade to a Lemmium Subscription to triple your allotted daily limit.
Lemmy can't handle triple my daily limit.
Lemmy can't handle half my daily limit.
Ever notice how right-wing news is free but actual news you have to pay for.
Because making up stories is much easier than actual journalism.
Lmao, it’s so funny! We pay for made up things in the entertainment industry, but also pay for the truth in media. Ah, capitalism.
The lies are alwsys free, though.
We pay for those in various other ways.
More like the proletariat it influences are the product being sold
And they make their money peddling boner pills, fear, and preparation buckets.
I literally don't read any articles that force me to register. I feel like I'm going to become rather ignorant because of it, but I don't want to participate in their schemes either.
Just add archive.today before the start of the URL
or 12ft.io
Companies (like the New York times) can pay 12ft.io to make them stop bypassing the paywall. archive.today doesn't take that money
(12ft is still a viable backup if archive.today is broken for a site, though)
huh TIL
I used to use 12ft but if rarely works for me now.
I use the Associated Press app. They have never asked me to pay and I don’t see stupid articles that are just links to Reddit or Cracked.
All the actual journalism getting paywalled probably isn't great for social/political discourse and our general grip on reality.
It's kind of ridiculous how quickly actual access to news and an informed world view, which WAS supposed to be one of the Internet's great advantages, has become a dream unless you pony up to the whimsies of every fucking publication board craving fat profits.
Yeah, plus it's not even like having to buy newspapers in the pre-internet days, it's all recurring subscriptions that are a pain to cancel. Truly a great shame.
It’s prices. You should be able to subscribe to a website for $3 a month
load more comments
(1 replies)
It sucks because journalists do need to make money to continue reporting. Spamming sites with ads is bad for the reader's experience too. Not totally sure what the solution is.
Just wait till they paywall the air.
Now you get that polluted city shit for free and only need to pay for access to premium country air. As time goes by we’ll all need to pay up.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Everything funded by a ton of ads wouldn't be great either. More state funding might be a solution but support for it is lackluster.
lpt- reuters only uses a soft paywall, you can bypass it pretty easily by opening articles in an incognito/private window
I always put the URL into the Wayback Machine on archive.org in these situations. 9 times out of 10 there's an archived version of the article with no paywall.
Yes. That or use Google Cache. They almost never show a paywall to the Google bot because that would hurt their page rank.
I wish there was a way to have responsible news sponsorship without having this annoying ass article limit system or web 3.0 crypto nonsense.
(I nearly flinched when writing that last sentence because I still have PTSD from Twitter summoning the Hordes if you so much as mention that c-word.)
I have a yearly subscription to WaPo for this reason. It's nice to have real news available without the hassle. Still have to deal with the nags on NYT, but one subscription is enough for me.
12ft.io works pretty well for articles like this
This about sums up the current state of things well.
Clear history/cookies and you can access it again.
Reuters is different right? I mean, they're actually producing content, not just taking user-created content and claiming that it's theirs.
They're definitely different, just found it ironic.
Glass cliff tho?
Same on bloomberg. Used to be free -> 10 articles per day -> complete paywall... Fuck that
Has anyone tried WebApps? I did and it didn't limit me when I passed my limit of 600
view more: next ›