this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
1598 points (98.0% liked)

memes

10754 readers
3386 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 96 points 1 year ago (12 children)

So, I don't trust them to have actually done what I'm going to describe, (and honestly I've just accepted that even with everything off, they're still giving me ads based on stuff I've only talked about and never clicked or written anything), but:

The programs that recognize specific phrases(Ok Google), are always separate from normal voice recognition (and much much lighter in terms of processing). So, if they weren't Google, they might have left the "Ok Google" recognition on, but not process anything else that the mic receives.

They're probably still listening in though.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Not necessarily you or your case, but I'm still convinced that a lot of people just have confirmation bias (only noticing it when it happens and discounting the thousands of otherwise innocent ads). There's also subconscious ad effects, like you were only talking about it to begin with because your saw it somewhere because it's been spreading by weird of mouth from people who initially saw an ad

[–] EatYouWell 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most of it is people on the same network as you searching for a thing.

[–] RGB3x3 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not just that either. Google knows who your family is. They know who lives with you because of location data. So any time those people search for anything regardless of whether they're on your home network, they likely serve ads to whole families at a time when one person searches for something.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SpaceNoodle 29 points 1 year ago

That's the gist of how it likely works; the wake word is detected by an "always on" audio DSP, but a software mode prevents the passing of microphone data back up to the SoC. I'm actually quite familiar with Amazon Echo engineering design, and they implement the "mute" feature in a manner that takes privacy seriously: the LED indicator on that button is hardwired to only turn on when the microphone is literally powered off. Thus, an Echo device can't even manage such a cheeky response, nor can a software bug or hack enable listening while the mute button is lit.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What you describe is actually how it works. If they actually sent all you say to their servers, it would be trivial to detect with a network analyser.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And if they were found to be sending it all the time, holy fuck the fines would end the company.

[–] EatYouWell 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lol, what are you talking about? When was the last time the FTC ended a company over shady privacy practices?

Amazon would get a fine that would amount to like 0.001% of one day's profits.

[–] rockSlayer 14 points 1 year ago

I will say that that's exactly how the google voice api works. Of course it's all in a black box, but that's how the documentation describes it and how it functions when making a voice app

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (22 children)

This is why we don't have such devices

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Voice assistants are money losing products. If they can do something like processing the wakewords on the device before chosing to send to a server they will. These companies are far too stingy to continuously stream audio to their servers

[–] linearchaos 13 points 1 year ago

Back in the day when everything had to be processed server-side sure.

Now we have purpose-built hardware helping work this shit out. The devices are basically capable of handling native language resolution locally. They're no longer need to farm the data out. I still don't think they're doing this we would see it in the open source operating systems, but if they wanted to any late model cell phone would be absolutely fine parsing out your interests from your conversations. Hell, I'm sure the contents of this dictation I'm making now are being reduced and added to my social graph at Google.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think this should be fairly easy to test yourself. Just disconnect from the WAN, say the wake word, and see if the device responds.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Sound's like it's just not sending the data back to Daddy Google. The OK Google/Alexa bit is done on a custom chip on the device. Clearly that bit isn't being turned off, but anything after that isn't being sent anywhere.

Probably just saves support calls this way from idiots who turn it off and forget.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] simin 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

only if phones can be like thinkpads which you can easily remove say the audio card from its motherboard.

[–] RGB3x3 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Then how would you use it as a phone?

[–] kaotic 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd love a "phone" that was just a mobile internet-connected device. I very rarely use it as an actual phone, primarily just for text, email, and web browsing.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

OK boomer

/s

[–] Aggravationstation 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Connect a headset via 3.5mm jack or Bluetooth Snowden explains how in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucRWyGKBVzo

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] douglasg14b 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter if the spyware is hardware installed in your SOCs!

Good ol Lenovo.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also, why isn't there a slide cover to physically cover the camera, and why can't I turn off the mic and camera separately? So I just use one of those black foam stickers to cover the camera.

[–] Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

One Plus 7 Pro had a camera that would physically dissappear when not in use.

Was my favorite phone for a while

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›