this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
102 points (96.4% liked)

Fediverse

17937 readers
53 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Let's not, okay? I don't want corpo shit in my free fediverse.

[–] themusicman 37 points 1 year ago

So join an instance which shares that opinion...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, only the people I like are allowed to play on this public playground....

But it won't matter once Lemmy brings in instance blocking for users.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's an existing feature of Kbin and it;s quite cool

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah some of the apps I've used have it but can't wait to just have it linked to my account so I don't have to reblock them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@DmMacniel Just be on instance that is defederated from them, done

@fossilesque

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That doesn't actually fix the issue. If Facebook is trying to set itself up like Chrome with the webplatform, or GTalk with XMPP, then they will drive the feature set of ActivityPub, whether you're federated with them or not.

Hypothetical example:

Want to see this picture/video from someone on Threads? You need Facebook's proprietary picture format, which has DRM baked in it. Even if you don't federate, Mastodon, Lemmy, etc now have to take energy away from their work to adopt the proprietary picture format. It depends on the proportion Threads takes on the network and how they can leverage that position to put pressure.

Threads currently has voice notes. Should all ActivityPub services support that? If so, do we adhere to Threads' standard or not?

[–] damon 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They don’t have to take energy to adopt the format. You do realise that current ActivityPub services don’t support all services and features of the other platforms? You realise a great deal of Fediverse utilises Mastodon’s implementation of AP? So a lot of what people are worried about Threads doing has already been done by Mastodon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It was just an example. The same can happen at the Mastodon-level instead of the Fediverse-level. Since there is some desired interop (e.g. between Mastodon and Lemmy), services do influence each other in their feature set.

I'm not sure what you mean by "a lot of what people are worried about Threads doing has already been done by Mastodon". Do you mean that the decisions that Mastodon make influence the rest of the Fediverse? If so, let's make sure we understand the difference here: Threads has a much more hostile disposition. Mastodon seems to have incentives aligned with the rest of the Fediverse services, and probably deserves the benefit of the doubt; Facebook has abused that benefit time and time again.

[–] damon 1 points 1 year ago

No, I'm talking about making extensions to the protocol that becomes the defacto standard

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

no thank you

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

that general purpose ai model is really coming along, aint it. i hear its got legs now

[–] MajorHavoc 21 points 1 year ago

I'm all for companies participating in open source communities... but this is the company that routinely blocks me from viewing my aunt's reposts of Russian state sponsored racist propeganda just because I don't install the incredibly invasive mobile app.

I can imagine a few ways that this could go wrong...

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Will be interesting to see how they deal with nazis and CSAM from all the Japanese servers.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is just posts on Threads being pushed out to Mastodon.

Still no way to publish to Threads users from outside the walled garden.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah will be interesting to see if they enable two-way federation. It's problematic for them

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I think even the Fediverse as is, has done an alright job with that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It’ll fit at home with their users.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Anyone know of kbin or Lemmy instances that will insta de-federate from anything meta?

Edit: missed the 'de'

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Assuming you meant de-federate, there are a few listed on https://fedipact.online/ that seem to be lemmy instances.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I myself already did. Many big instances also do

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I'm very curious how this will all shake out. I can understand all of you who want to block Threads and the only two instances that I am on myself are going to do exactly that, but it seems tremendously likely that the flagship instance of the fediverse, mastodon.social, will federate and it will have a massive impact on not just the culture, but also on the codebase. For example I wonder what services will go for feature parity and add features like voice notes which Threads added recently. Oh and culture-wise, with POTUS joining Threads, big institutions like the White House will suddenly appear on the fediverse.

Still holding out hope that a bunch of new users and new ideas will rejuvenate the fediverse, in any case 2024 should be a big year for it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I look forward to the additional people Threads could bring here. Once the conversations are both directions I think many people will migrate to this side to avoid ads and Meta.