this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
330 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

60367 readers
7446 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Telecom Industry Is Very Mad Because The FCC MIGHT Examine High Broadband Prices::We've long noted how the FCC (regardless of party) largely ignores how muted competition and monopolization drives up prices for consumers. The agency often talks a good (if ambiguous) game about "bridging the digital divide," but they don't collect and share pricing data proving market failure, nor are they capable of admitting monopolies exist and…

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] foggy 47 points 1 year ago

God I would love to see the government sacrifice Comcast to please us peons.

Just put their balls in a vice grip already. Fuck.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Would it just not be better to manage all unavoidable charges to be included in the sticker price?

For everything, not just broadband.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What?!? But then how are companies going to manipulate their pricing to attract new customers away from their competitors without actually cutting any revenue? They neeeed this to keep their numbers up so they look more attractive to investors and get more money. Are you not thinking of the shareholders? Why won't anyone think of the shareholders!

/s ... if that was not obvious

[–] Drusenija 2 points 1 year ago

Sorry, no, not obvious, this is likely exactly what they're thinking, no sarcasm needed.

[–] shalafi 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, it goes like this:

"WE only want to charge you $X! But here are the fees the government tacks on. For your benefit, we'll break those fees out local/state/federal. See? It's them fucking you, not us.

And because we're all being hit so unfairly, we're just passing it on, cost of doing business. And there's overhead to dealing with all that nonsense, tacking that on as well. And one more, because fuck you gonna do? Break down all this mess and point fingers?"

Enrages everyone, but deflects blame from the ISP. Perfect, ain't it?

Funny thing is, much of that bullshit talk is true! If they roll it up in a nice total, you don't what or why you're paying. And yes, many of those fees, especially the small ones, are government taxation. Taxation they have to account for, and someone has to pay.

OTOH, the "fuck you" charges are disingenuous. Those should be wrapped up in $X.

Only answer I got is to make ISPs quasi-government/private hybrids, and regulate them like the utilities they are in 2024.

I expect them to profit. I expect them to provide for investors. That's how corporations work. You bet your money, you expect a fair return, and much of our individual funds (retirement) get a tiny piece. They should have money in the bank to absorb future risk, unknown costs. That's OK!

But why the hell are basic services, and I now count telecom as "basic", allowed such wild profit margins?!

We had such a "quasi" deal with the regional power company, seemed to work great (and I admit ignorance on the details). Leadership was elected and accountable. Until it got bought out by a private firm and prices spiked 40%. How the fuck was that legal?!

(Sorry about the rant OP. I was in the game for some time, thought about this a lot.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Split out all the costs you want, itemize the bill, have at it. But if the sticker price says 45 dollah i want to be able to pay that and get what you offer. not have to take out the calculator and add stuff. I think there are to many americans obsessed with "big goberment stealing my moniez" .. who cares. If its in the price and the price is competitive I dont care that x% is tax. It will be the same on all competing products too.

[–] takeda 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What we truly need is local loop unbundling (remember with landlines, you could switch your phone provider or use different ISPs for DSL, this was possible due to that) to make smaller ISPs enter the market and be able to lease existing last mile and bring back strong antitrust laws to prevent mergers.

[–] Pollo_Jack 8 points 1 year ago

Nope, nationalize it. Texas has a million energy providers and still hasn't had prices as low as when it was a public utility. The same applies to every other utility such as water or internet.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

The sacrosanct right to fuck people sideways for profit must never be scrutinized. Otherwise god's wrath will come upon us.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (19 children)

Kinda curious. Americans of lemmy: How much do you pay for internet?

I'm up a bit north Eh. Paying cad$135 (usd~$99.50) monthly before tax for Gigabit with no data cap.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m super lucky. Apartment has integrated dirt cheap symmetrical 1gb for ~$30/mo

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Damn, that's a good deal.

Is rent a bitch to compensate? Or is that decent too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Rents not bad (~$1300 w/ utilities ~750sq ft) but most stores are 5-10 min drive. Pretty close to perfect just wish it was in walkable neighborhood

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I pay $39.99 USD for 300 megabit symmetrical fiber.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Jerkface 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

75Mbit down / 10 Mbit up with a 1.2TByte monthly cap: $30 a month.

[–] glarf 3 points 1 year ago

$80/mo symmetrical gig, no cap, fiber. ATT is shit but they've been very reliable with this service, first time I've been a happy customer of theirs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

~$70 for a 500/30 plan on Spectrum over on the east coast for me.

Also no data cap, thankfully...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

80 for 300/10 but the 300 usually maxes out around 210-250 depending on time of day. Also spectrum, also eastern timezone.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have symmetrical gigabit for $75/month. It was $65 but Centurylink decided to raise it randomly a few months ago with no warning. The notification that my bill would be going up came after the date they said it would be going up and after I received the increased bill. No data cap though and no extra bullshit fees.

The alternative is through Wave that would not be symmetrical and would come with a cap.

[–] AA5B 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just went up, but not too bad: $84/mon gigabit symmetrical, and I don’t know of any data cap.

Meanwhile my ex lives in an island of darkness where her HOA has an exclusive contract with Comcast. I believe “the new xFinity 10g network!!!” Is limited to 200/20, plus has horrendous latency, and I think she pays more than me for the abuse

[–] bajabound 2 points 1 year ago

$137/mo USD total.

Microwave service: $100 for 100/100mbps, 1TB of data. $7.00 for fucking DHCP to be enabled on their router. $30 for an additional 1TB of data.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You're going to get numbers all over the place lol.

I'm $70 for a gig up and down. My parents are $150 for 150mb down and either 15mb or 25mb up. They also have a 1 gig soft cap before getting throttled.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

oof getting robbed, Rogers has gigabit for around 80CAD if you negotiate with them. Assuming you're in a city with them

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Only provider available at my address (Telus, ugh).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I'm sure the dark brotherhood will keep them safe

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

$56 for 500, no caps

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

$120 USD for 700/20

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

IDK, I think it's around probably around $100 or more because xfinity made it cheaper to bundle with an unnecessary TV service that only my parents really ever use.

I don't know what our actual speed down and up is since we live in an apartment, so that might scew results. All I know is I usually get better speeds in the middle of the night when people aren't active online.

[–] wamasi 1 points 1 year ago

~75$ for 1gb - Fiber. Otherwise looking at 100$+ for the same with a cap.

~130$ for 100 to 200mb - Starlink. From a relative who lives rural south of me and only has HughesNet as an alternative because the only cable provider doesn't want to service an additional mile for a few houses.

[–] the_tab_key 1 points 1 year ago

$80usd for like 200 mbit down, 10 up. Cable monopoly in my area. FiOS isn't super far away but it isn't getting closer...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My friend in the country pays $135 US/month for 400mbps down, 20mbps up (realistic speeds are closer to 50x5), and that's after he negotiated. Originally, they wanted to charge him $150 US. I told him to go elsewhere. He said he has Spectrum or ATT ($65 US/month for 25x5). Pity.