this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
162 points (93.5% liked)

Firefox

17301 readers
64 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 86 points 11 months ago (5 children)

What gets me is when websites don't work on Safari. Really? Like a significant portion of traffic is to iOS, it's a single browser you have to target, on millions of devices. And you couldn't even make it work there.

Web dev today is a bunch of crap.

[–] cm0002 38 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Web dev today is a bunch of crap.

Always has been

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Fair point.

I do think it's gotten a lot worse though.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Blame apple, unless you're expecting every single web dev in the world to buy a mac just for QA

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

As a web developer, I agree

But ensuring full compatibility with all three major engines (those being gecko, blink and webkit) is unnecessarily hard, as they have their own subset of features

For example: Webkit does not support extending built-in HTML elements using WebComponent, but Gecko and Blink do support this feature. Or Chrome being the only browser that fully supports the View Transitions API. Or webkit's CSS vendor prefixes

The list goes on and on.

You could fix most of these issues by providing polyfills, but that increases the amount of files that you have to load in order to make a feature work on other browsers.

If only there was some sort of standard... Oh wait, there is one, W3C. Idk what they are doing tho.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Safari is crap. Don't use a iPhone and expect a browser to work as it should.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

And the rendering engines are quite similar since Chrome's was forked from Safari's.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I am personally unaware of any serious reason to believe that Firefox’s numbers will improve soon.

Either the author doesn't know about the Manifest v2 deprecation or is saying it's "unserious" to believe this might improve Firefox's market share. Either way, goofy.

[–] davidgro 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, the masses just don't care - extensions/add-ons are "too complex" for the typical user.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I would say that pretty much no one cares about the deprecation of Manifest v2 outside our little tech circle. Heck, not even the tech circle cares too much about this given how many use Chrome anyway. I hate to be saying this, but I'm afraid the author is right.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I hate to break it to you but Firefox is terrible in the UI/UX department. I wish Mozilla was better at actually being a good company and nonprofit but they seem to have fallen to the way side.

With that being said, I will refuse to use anything other than librewolf. My government isn't going to dictate what browser to use. I do a lot of paper anyway so its not a big deal.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

How is it terrible though? Argument it, because in my opinion, the UI is very similar across all browsers, and Firefox UX has always been better for me.

[–] Sanctus 39 points 11 months ago

Doubt, it may have less market share now but could still have more total users. Apple needs to be made to allow real alternative browser on the iPhone, and why are chromium browsers counted separately?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 11 months ago

It shouldn't matter as long as the sites are developed only with open standards.

We already have webcompat for anything truly broken.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This shouldn't be a big deal unless they go out of their way to use non-standard Chrome-only features.

It's not like the early 2000s where you absolutely had to test everything on every browser because they differed so much and everyone was adding random non-standard features. I haven't ran into something that doesn't work on Firefox in quite a long time, even when all the development happens on Chrome.

Pretty much everything these days ends up through babel and automatic polyfills and browserlists. Unless they have a whole custom framework that somehow directly uses Chrome-specific APIs it's unlikely Firefox will be left unusable. They have to deal with Safari regardless, and if Safari works, Firefox probably does. Safari is like the new IE these days in terms of bugs and missing standard features, and because you're forced to use Safari on iOS, and iPhones are so popular, I seriously doubt they'd drop Safari either.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

I will refuse to use it unless it works in a all browsers. I can't control other companies but I will not pay tax money to have a broken website.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

using reported user agents that hit a singular site is a pretty shitty way of determining market share.