this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
156 points (97.0% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

2135 readers
219 users here now

This is a community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Keep discussion civil and on topic.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 69 points 11 months ago (23 children)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago (2 children)

there will be a high-profile class action lawsuit, lawyers will get paid. those that 'bought' content that got deleted will get a $10 voucher for more digital content.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

When it comes to lawsuits, companies just look at it from a economic perspective.

How much will it cost to do nothing

How much will it cost to do something and pay for the change and pay off customers as little as possible.

They don't care about what is right or wrong, what is moral and what is not, what laws to follow and what laws to break ..... all they care about is either saving money or making money.

If they could justify crushing hundreds of little puppies because it could save money for the company .... they'd do it and launch a marketing campaign to tell us all that it is acceptable.

[–] ITypeWithMyDick 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Would the puppy crushing machine be next to the orphan crushing machine? The company will need to at least one to maximize profit.

Its not their fault, why dont you ever think of the shareholders!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If there was a way to maintain or increase profits by running both machines .... they'd run both machines

btw: do you type faster aroused or when flaccid?

[–] CosmicTurtle 2 points 11 months ago

Ha! Every one of their customers agreed to an arbitration clause and, I bet, even protects Sony from this exact situation.

Remember you don't own anything. Just a license to use the media however they see fit.

Piracy ftw!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This is how most digital media works. You're not buying the media, you're buying a license for the media. Unfortunately, usually there's a clause in the EULA about how the license can be revoked at any time.

[–] o0joshua0o 18 points 11 months ago

You're right, but that is a bullshit system that can easily disenfranchise the customer, and people are right to be upset about it.

[–] Gigan 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Correct. It's just a lot harder to revoke on physical media.

[–] echo64 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It's not just harder. It's impossible. Physical media is yours, and the license to view is not revocable. You do own the media.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Many games have online DRM, so even if you have them on disk, one day they will stop working.

[–] echo64 1 points 11 months ago

Only on PC. And pc games don't really have physical releases. On console this isn't a thing unless the game requires an online server because it's a multiplayer game

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

(Within the limits of IP laws. In some countries, making a personal backup of a DVD is an illegal act. Breaking DRM to do so may be a separate illegal act, again depending on jurisdiction. Neither is immoral of course, but that doesn't stop lawmakers and judges from kissing the slimy boots of corporate lobbyists.)

[–] Son_of_dad 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I once lost a game from my ps library, just vanished. I still had the saves in my hard drive. So I called PlayStation who said it could have been a network glitch from the update, but since they lost any record of the purchase and I had made it years earlier, so I deleted the email, I never got my game back. That's why I despise digital Games. Sony can't walk in my house and take my physical game, but you break a rule or there's a glitch and suddenly Sony can steal back every game you bought

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

protip: don't delete receipts.

most email storage these days is so ridiculously huge, there's no reason to delete those emails. make a folder for them (Playstation receipts, Steam receipts, etc).

that said, physical media is on it's way out. i'd be surprised if the next gen of systems is even offered with a disc drive. at this point, most games are way more data than a Blu-Ray can hold.

[–] lemmefixdat4u 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Physical media really doesn't help, because many games are delivered with bad bugs. These are fixed by updates. Unless you can actually download and archive the updates, reinstalling a deleted/corrupted game from backup media alone is impossible.

What is needed is a consumer bill of rights that requires companies to provide the purchased game with the latest update to the buyer upon request should they abandon it. If the game requires a server, that software code should be made public domain. An abandoned online game's copyright should also be voided. That would allow the gaming community to legally provide updates and servers for continued use.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Another problem with physical media is games are quickly becoming, and often already are, bigger than a disc can hold. Even a dual layer UHD-Blu-ray is "only" 100gb.

At this rate next gen consoles are gonna have to follow Nintendo and go back to cartridges if they wanna keep physical media an option. Not that I'm opposed to that.

[–] SexyTimeSasquatch 8 points 11 months ago

Well yeah, this behavior was completely foreseeable. Obviously you could take to the high seas, but if you want to legally own a copy of media, buy a physical copy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yeah. Its worth remembering that tv/movies tend to have MUCH stricter distribution rights. Generally speaking, a purchased game is available for the lifetime of the service (whether it is playable depends on backend stuff). Whereas, if Discovery says "Get our sexy walrus off your service" you lose it instantly*

Its one of the reasons that I generally don't see the point in buying "digital media" outside of special circumstances. I am either going to "rent" it (either pay a rental fee or have a subscription) or get the blu-ray (... if available).

*: Fun "fact": This is speculated to be why Sony's backwards compatibility is such a mess. During the PS1 and PS2 era, they likely were making distribution deals closer to music/movies than the (modern) video games. That is why you have such insanity like the digital version of Tomba 2 (I think) only being playable on a PSP, not a Vita or a PS3. And other weird ass messes because of how distribution rights and contracts were passed around. Whereas Microsoft "started" with software licensing agreements and have a LOT more flexibility for the XBOX/PS2 era.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If it's not on your hard drive it's not yours.

We all thought it was, and they sold us on it. Now we see the truth.