this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
156 points (97.0% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

2146 readers
43 users here now

This is a community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Keep discussion civil and on topic.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When it comes to lawsuits, companies just look at it from a economic perspective.

How much will it cost to do nothing

How much will it cost to do something and pay for the change and pay off customers as little as possible.

They don't care about what is right or wrong, what is moral and what is not, what laws to follow and what laws to break ..... all they care about is either saving money or making money.

If they could justify crushing hundreds of little puppies because it could save money for the company .... they'd do it and launch a marketing campaign to tell us all that it is acceptable.

[–] ITypeWithMyDick 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would the puppy crushing machine be next to the orphan crushing machine? The company will need to at least one to maximize profit.

Its not their fault, why dont you ever think of the shareholders!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If there was a way to maintain or increase profits by running both machines .... they'd run both machines

btw: do you type faster aroused or when flaccid?