this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
101 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19271 readers
1855 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dee 30 points 1 year ago

Jokes on her, I'm never going to be able to retire in our current system anyway!

Check mate 😏

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

My retirement plan is to keep working until my mind is so far gone that I can't work any more and can no longer perceive my abject poverty. I will then eat kibble because I won't know the difference. This plan is flawless.

I joke but at the same time I'm not so certain the reality will be all that different.

[–] Sanctus 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Awh shit shes using misty step

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

She's not that high level. This is blur at best.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


But Wall Street isn’t completely resigned to Trump’s inevitability; there has been a late surge in big-money support for Nikki Haley, the former governor of South Carolina.

And there is, to be fair, still a chance that Trump — who is facing many criminal charges and whose public rants have become utterly unhinged — will manage to crash and burn before securing the nomination.

“Flip-flopping” doesn’t really convey the sheer cynicism with which she has shifted her rhetoric and changed her positions on everything from abortion rights to immigration to whether it’s OK to try overturning a national election.

In particular, she seems exceptionally explicit, even among would-be Republican nominees, in calling for an increase in the age at which Americans become eligible for Social Security — a bad idea that seems to be experiencing a revival.

The first thing you should know about Social Security is that the actual numbers don’t justify the apocalyptic rhetoric one often hears, not just from the right but from self-proclaimed centrists who want to sound serious.

So anyone invoking rising life expectancy as a reason to delay Social Security benefits is, in effect, saying that aging janitors must keep working (or be cast into extreme poverty) because bankers are living longer.


The original article contains 904 words, the summary contains 208 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Additional_Prune 11 points 1 year ago

George Carlin predicted this years ago.

[–] TechyDad 11 points 1 year ago

So her plan is basically: keep Social Security as it is for anyone who has it right now (i.e. people who might vote for her and who would get mad if she cut benefits) and work to minimize anyone else getting onto Social Security by increasing the age over and over.

I already figured I'd be working until I was 80. I guess I'll just work until I'm 90. Maybe I'll be lucky and get one or two good retirement years in.

[–] KonalaKoala 6 points 1 year ago

That could change into "Nikki Haley Is Coming to Federal Prison"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

What retirement?